2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 661–662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 04:42
661
-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:18
662
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
112.0%
avg views ÷ 661 subscribers
Avg views / post
740
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.135%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
13 (26 December 2025 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
740
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17
60.7%
👏
7
25.0%
🔥
2
7.14%
⚡
1
3.57%
👍
1
3.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ آینده از آنِ کسانی است که امروز یاد میگیرند! ✨
انجمن علمی مهندسی کامپیوتر دانشگاه بیرجند برگزار میکند:
🧠 دوره تخصصی آشنایی با اصول اولیه شبکههای عصبی
📆 ۵ جلسه فشرده و کاربردی
🗓 شنبه و چهارشنبه ها، ساعت ۱۰ صبح
فرصتی بینظیر برای ورود به دنیای هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری عمیق.
💰 هزینه ثبت نام: ۳۵۰ هزار تومان
(سرمایه های کوچک برای یک تحول بزرگ!)
ظرفیت محدود—پس زودتر جای خودتو رزرو کن! 🚀
برای ثبت نام به آیدی زیر پیام دهی…
از دانشکده مهندسی بیرجند تا قلب دانشگاههای اروپا! 🎓🇮🇹
تا حالا فکر کردی مسیری که از “دانشگاه بیرجند” طی کردی تا الان بشه دانشجوی “دانشگاه بولونیا ایتالیا”، چقدر به مسیر ما نزدیکه؟ 🤔
خیلی وقتها فکر میکنیم مهاجرت تحصیلی فقط برای عدهی خاصی با شرایط عجیبه؛ اما اینبار قراره با کسی صحبت کنیم که تا همین چند سال پیش، مثل تکتک ما سر کلاسهای مهندسی برق دانشگاه بیرجند مینشست. 🎓🇮🇷
میخوایم بدون تعارف و پردهبرداری، از ص…
🔥 اگه نتونستی توی جلسه حضوری معارفه BCPC شرکت کنی، اصلاً جای نگرانی نیست. تمام نکاتی که برای شروع و موفقیت در این مسیر نیاز داری، توی این ویس جمع شده.
📌 در این نشست چی گذشت؟
صفر تا صد ساختار مسابقات BCPC
نقشه راه برای کسانی که میخوان تازه شروع کنن
فوتوفنهای رتبهآوردن از زبان دانشجوهای با تجربه
🎧 همین الان گوش بده و خودت رو برای مسابقه آماده کن! 🚀
🧠 نشریه شماره ۱۳، زمستان ۱۴۰۴
👋 به منظور بهرهمندی هرچه بیشتر شما همراهان همیشگی فرامتن، این نسخه از نشریه، به دو زبان فارسی و انگلیسی منتشر شده است :)
📝 نشریه ما را در شبکههای اجتماعی دنبال کنید:
[ 📱 telegram | 😎 instagram | 📱 linkedin ]
💣 یه بمب زمستونی از فرامتن!
🧠 ورود به جهان هوش مصنوعی
🤝 هوش مصنوعی دیگه صرفا یه اسم آشنا نیست؛ یه پل واسه ارتباط با آیندهای که قبلا خیلی دور به نظر میرسید!
📖 نشریهای که قراره مطالعه کنین، حاصل تلاشهای بیوقفه یه تیم پایه و پرانرژیه!
در این مسیر از کمکهای همیشگی دکتر مینا امیری و همکاری نویسندههای فعال این حوزه یاری گرفتیم!
❓ خوشحال میشیم اگر درباره بخشی از نشریه سوال یا کامنتی داشتی، بهمون اطلاع بدی!😊🌱
⚠…
قوانین شرکت کنندگان
1• شرکت کنندگان باید دانشجو در مقطع کارشناسی یا تحصیلات تکمیلی باشند و یا در یک سال اخیر فارغ التحصیل شده باشند.
2• هر تیم حداکثر شامل 3 عضو و فقط یکی از اعضای تیم میتواند دانشجوی تحصیلات تکمیلی باشد.
3• هر دانشجو میتواند فقط در یک تیم ثبت نام کند .
4• یک تیم میتواند متشکل از دانشگاههای مختلف باشد.
قوانین مسابقه
1• مسابقه به صورت حضوری برگزار میشود.
2• هر تیم همراه خود لپ تاپ داشته باش…
🎉ثبت نام چهارمین هفته از دوره دوم لیگ BCPC 🎉
افراد و تیم هایی که متقاضی شرکت در مسابقه این هفته هستید از طریق لینک میتونید ثبت نام کنید.
نکته: لطفا قبل از ثبت نام تمام قوانین مسابقه را مطالعه کنید.🙏
🔴مسابقه این هفته به صورت فقط حضوری برگزار خواهد شد.
دوستانی که با فضای مسابقه (دامجاج) آشنایی ندارند از طریق لینک میتوانند به ویدیوی توضیح دامجاج دسترسی داشته باشند.
🎯 گزارش نتایج مسابقه CTF
💻 مسابقات Capture The Flag (CTF) با حضور دانشجویان مستعد برگزار شد و تیمهای رتبهآور از بیرجند موفق به کسب جایگاههای برتر این رقابت علمی شدند.
🏆 تیمهای رتبهآور بیرجند:
🥇 رتبه اول : ByteOff
• روحالله ناصری
• امیرحسین حلیمی
• علیرضا رحیمپناه
4️⃣ رتبه چهارم : ENM
• احسان نوکندی
• معین جعفری
• نوید عثمانی
5️⃣ رتبه پنجم : Fanniteam
• سعید آبادیان
• عرفان غفرانی
• احسان نوفرستی
📢 کانال …
❤7👏4
Signed | NIMA |
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @SSOCS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 573,671 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scientific Society of Computer Engineering - UB” (@SSOCS), 661 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SSOCS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.