Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SSB | TACTICAL

@SSB_Tactical

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

264subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002665571395
TypeChannel
Username@SSB_Tactical
DescriptionАссоциация инструкторов сил специального назначения «Совет Серых беретов» России. • Официальный канал: https://t.me/SeryyeBerety
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SSB_Tactical

Growth

2647 Aug 2026, 19:33 — 264 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:02 — 264 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:338 Aug 2026, 09:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:02264no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:33264first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 264 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held16 (8 April 202617 July 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
135
Videos
18
Links
94

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

280 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53775200134795449876824.3%
custom 53665789193004322004315.4%
🔥3311.8%
custom 53439061434271115773111.1%
3111.1%
custom 5440739161822758896248.57%
custom 5364114690404285446176.07%
❤‍🔥165.71%
custom 5442814142127834926103.57%
custom 547420602373453605651.79%
custom 524008702571710142320.714%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC103 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

🔥121

12 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ: ᴀɴᴀʟᴏɢᴏᴠɴᴇᴛ | ᴍɪᴍɪᴄʀʏᴀ Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

❤‍🔥51

1 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈8,970 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 544073916182275889611custom 534390614342711157721

14 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC291 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 53775200134795449878custom 53665789193004322005❤‍🔥3custom 53439061434271115773

13 Jun 2026, 20:41 UTC235 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

🔥7custom 53665789193004322006❤‍🔥2custom 52400870257171014232custom 53439061434271115772

2 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC272 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 54407391618227588969❤‍🔥2custom 53439061434271115772custom 54742060237345360562

2 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC235 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 537752001347954498713custom 534390614342711157742custom 54407391618227588962

2 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC196 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 537752001347954498710custom 53439061434271115778❤‍🔥2custom 54407391618227588962

31 May 2026, 14:38 UTC232 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 536657891930043220014custom 53775200134795449876custom 544281414212783492621

30 May 2026, 18:59 UTC202 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Мы ВКонтакте vk.ru/ssb_tactical Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

🔥7custom 53665789193004322007custom 547420602373453605631custom 53439061434271115771

18 May 2026, 14:59 UTC271 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 Мы ВКонтакте vk.ru/ssb_tactical Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

custom 54428141421278349267custom 536411469040428544651

9 May 2026, 17:38 UTC314 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗬𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗬 PARTNER: 𝗪𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗙𝗔𝗟𝗟 Подписаться | Поддержать бустом

🔥7custom 53775200134795449874custom 536657891930043220021

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SSB_Tactical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 506,451 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SSB | TACTICAL” (@SSB_Tactical), 264 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SSB_Tactical.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.