2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 338–340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 10:30
339
no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:20
339
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 339 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
1,249
Reactions total
46
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
343
Videos
51
Links
85
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5211209164562401319
22
23.2%
🔥
18
18.9%
custom 5206183782243142299
17
17.9%
custom 5298646168903908755
10
10.5%
💯
10
10.5%
🤩
5
5.26%
custom 5298569160140293597
4
4.21%
🏆
4
4.21%
👍
4
4.21%
🤔
1
1.05%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Студенческие парламентские клубы передали более двух тонн корма приютам для животных
С 2024 года ребята на регулярной основе организуют адресные сборы в рамках направления «СПКПомогает».
💓 С момента запуска к инициативе присоединились более 500 человек, которые не только собирают и отвозят корм, но и помогают сотрудникам приютов, участвуют в уходе за животными.
⭕️ Всего прошло свыше 50 выездов в разные муниципальн…
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️
⚡Родился в селе Няксимволь Ханты-Мансийского округа.
⚡По образованию инженер-технолог. Окончил Костромской технологический институт, а юриспруденцию получил уже позже.
⚡Любит охоту и рыбалку. Говорят, в тайге чувствует себя увереннее, чем в кабинете.
⚡Начинал карьеру с завода. Работал на Костромском заводе деревообрабатывающих станков сварщиком и технологом.
⚡Руководит регионом с 2010 года.
✅Яркая индивидуальность и искренность, даже с риском быть непонятым.73%
🚫Сдержанность, тактичность и умение подбирать слова.32%
📌Напишу свой вариант в комментариях, у меня особое мнение.0%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤥🫠😀😓😜😜
«Я такой, какой я есть. В этом моя прелесть» .
— Владимир Жириновский, основатель ЛДПР, депутат всех восьми созывов Государственной думы.
🔖Владимир Вольфович Жириновский стал настоящим феноменом в российской политике. Участвовал в шести президентских выборах и почти 30 лет возглавлял ЛДПР. Его яркие выступления разбирали на цитаты, а сам он повторял: задача политика — быть честным с людьми, даже если это звуч…
И снова в эфире! 🎙
Сегодня с нашими друзьями из Radio Mediametrics провели эфир с Гвардии майором Вооружённых сил РФ в запасе, участником СВО, ветераном боевых действий Эдуардом Шоновым! 🇷🇺
Поговорили об учебе в военном университете Министерства обороны РФ, службе на СВО, программе «Время героев» и, конечно же, о личном.
Диалог получился очень открытым и интересным!
#СемьяСПК
#ПОВЕСТКА 20.07-26.07
♦️ ВЦИОМ предоставляет актуальные рейтинги политических партий:
1) 🐻 Единая Россия 32,7% (2,6%🔽)
2) 🟥КПРФ – 11,8% (1,8%🔼)
3) 🧴 Новые люди 10,5% (0,2%🔽)
4) 🟦 ЛДПР – 9,6% (1,4%🔼)
5) 🟨 Справедливая Россия 5,4% (1,4%🔼)
Непарламентские партии 9,5%
🔴Мигрантам в России запретили жениться на россиянках старше 80 лет для получения гражданства.
Госдума приняла закон, который закроет возможность для полу…
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️
⚡В детстве хотел стать физиком-ядерщиком. Поступил в МИФИ, но передумал и перевёлся в МГИМО
⚡Говорит на трёх языках: русском, английском и французском.
⚡В молодости работал переводчиком в советском посольстве в Камбодже. Там же пережил падение режима Пол Пота
⚡Коллекционирует песни собственного сочинения. Да-да, он пишет стихи и музыку, исполняет под гитару
⚡Никогда не пользовался интернетом…
#ПОВЕСТКА 13.07-19.07
♦️ Последние рейтинги политических партий от ВЦИОМ:
1) 🐻 Единая Россия 35,3% (0,7%🔼)
2) 🧴 Новые люди 10,7% (0,8%🔽)
3) 🟥КПРФ – 10,1% (0,2%🔽)
4) 🟦 ЛДПР – 8,2% (2,2%🔽)
5) 🟨 Справедливая Россия 4% (1,4%🔽)
Непарламентские партии 10%
🔴ЦИК РФ заверил списки кандидатов в депутаты Госдумы всех 11 партий, которые будут участвовать в выборах.
🔴Разблокировать Telegram предложили в Госдуме после удаления …
✅Видеть в испытаниях возможность для роста и укрепления.78%
🚫Воспринимать кризис как потерю и стараться минимизировать ущерб.39%
📌Напишу свой вариант в комментариях, у меня особое мнение на этот счет.0%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SPK_PA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
✅Яркая индивидуальность и искренность, даже с риском быть непонятым.73%
🚫Сдержанность, тактичность и умение подбирать слова.32%
📌Напишу свой вариант в комментариях, у меня особое мнение.0%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅Видеть в испытаниях возможность для роста и укрепления.78%
🚫Воспринимать кризис как потерю и стараться минимизировать ущерб.39%
📌Напишу свой вариант в комментариях, у меня особое мнение на этот счет.0%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ Предсказуемость и стабильность правил для всех.36%
🚫 Гибкость и возможность жёстко действовать в кризисных ситуациях.57%
📌 Напишу свой вариант в комментариях, у меня особое мнение.7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 736,435 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СПК Президентской академии” (@SPK_PA), 339 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SPK_PA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
