🙋♂
👍15❤6

Channel
@SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
845subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001631581568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 845 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 846 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 852 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 857 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 859 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 860 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 861 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 861 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
50 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 30.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2024 to 5 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🙋♂
👍15❤6
📣 5% DISCOUNT COUPON : burgem05 https://fundednext.com/?fpr=burgem38
❤6👍2🔥1
https://t.me/SMC_ALEX
👍2❤1
AUDCAD PREMIUM UPDATE ✅✅ triggered and smashed just enter and fall down to the ground 13+ pips running zero drawdown 1:1.3rr zero dd save half lot sl set at entry point ✅🤑🔥
🏆3👍2
AUDCAD sell now @ 0.88720 tp @ 0.88550 tp 2 @ 0.88300 Sl @ 0.88810 ( 09 pips )
❤🔥3❤1👍1
EURUSD sell limit @ 1.0877 other sell at @ 1.0893 tp @ 1.0823 tp2 @ 1.0720 SL @ 1.0910 (33 pips)
👍2
EURJPY sell now @ 164.55 tp @ 163.30 tp2 @ 160.60 SL @ 165.12
❤🔥1
US30 UPDATE ✅✅ limit triggered and smashed finally zero drawdown 120+ pips running near to tp1 save half lot set sl in profit zoon ✅🤑🔥 #sniper_entries_always Enjoy with us !
❤1❤🔥1
120+ pips both limits close one order set sl in profit zoon 🔥 #gfr
XAUUSD UPDATE ✅✔️ Smacked running in 45+ pips sl move to entry point and take some profit 🔥🤑✅ #Easy_trading #enjoy_with_WFR
XAUUSD UPDATE ✅✅ one more time both limits triggered and smashed 70 + pips running now zero drawdown sniper entry formula 🔥 save half lot now and set sl at entry point for safety 🤑🔥 #BE_ON_QUALITY_TRADING🔥 #BE_WITH_THE_BEST_TO_BECOME_THE_BEST 🔥
❤🔥1
Triggered ☝️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SMC_ANALYSIS SIGNALS” (@SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS), 845 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SMC_ANALYSIS_SIGNALS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.