13 Sept 2025, 01:23 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 August 2026
👏
Channel
Slavyangrad Analytica ☭
@SLGAnalytica
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
700subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001767917640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SLGAnalytica |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SLGAnalytica |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 700 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 700 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 40 | 32.3% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 19.4% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 12.1% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 9.68% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 7.26% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 6.45% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 4.03% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
12 Sept 2025, 02:06 UTC≈1,060 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Another wonderful saying from Russia's “friend” and opponent of arms supplies to Ukraine—the late Charlie Kirk: “Russia is a clan-based fascist dictatorship. Russia is far from a republic. They can, of course, call themselves that, but it is a plutocratic clan-based fascist dictatorship.” Maybe I don't understand something, but the Banderites in Ukraine today say exactly the same thing, word for word. And the damne…
👏18💯14❤2🔥2
10 Sept 2025, 09:42 UTC790 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
So, Poland has stopped short (thus far) of invoking NATO's Article 5.
😁2🐳1🤨1
10 Sept 2025, 09:31 UTC674 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
A Series of Provocations Overnight, the Poles announced that five to ten UAVs attacked their territory. The airports of Rzeszów and Warsaw were closed. Videos allegedly showing the impact site (in reality, a car burning due to mechanical reasons in Lublin) and Ukrainian citizens allegedly shouting “Poland! I can't believe it!” in Poland were uploaded from Ukraine. And also, for greater credibility, F-35s were flying…
👍1
10 Sept 2025, 08:39 UTC463 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
There is a commotion in Poland; allegedly, as many as 14 UAVs of “unknown nationality” flew into Polish airspace last night. Dozens of fighters were scrambled to intercept, four drones were shot down, the rest were supposedly “lost on radar” by electronic warfare means. An alert was sounded for 9 million Poles, the Polish Ministry of Defense announced an urgent call-up of reservists, and Polish Prime Minister Donal…
👍2
13 Aug 2025, 00:40 UTC599 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Azerbaijani garbage dumps went into a frenzy after another series of strikes on energy facilities in Ukraine linked to Azerbaijani businesses. The situation flared up especially fiercely after a strike in the Odessa region, where a gas compressor station was hit a few days ago, through which Azerbaijan planned to supply gas to Ukraine via Romania. Literally a few days after the promotional announcement, it was taken …
👍5🔥4👏3❤1
13 Aug 2025, 00:39 UTC430 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
13 Aug 2025, 00:27 UTC460 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
A brief report from the front on August 12, 2025 Something is happening in the Konstantinovka-Krasnoarmeysk sector. Yesterday, in the brief report from 11.08.2025, we speculated on the direction and development of the actions of the Armed Forces of Russia units in this sector, basing our assumptions and reflections on information obtained from Russian media. Today we will show the picture as seen by our enemy. The i…
👍4👏3
13 Aug 2025, 00:20 UTC306 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
And now another map, this time one of Marat Khairullin's beauties. Explanation in the next post.
👍2
12 Aug 2025, 10:14 UTC296 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
A couple of maps (from an avowedly pro-Ukrainian twitter account) showing the various military units in the latest most active centre of operations. In response to the breach of Ukraine's defensive New Donbass Line, units of Azov and the 92nd Brigade (assault infantry—shown on the map here situated just west of the settlement of Rubezhnoe) have been sent to plug the gap. It's important to note that the Russian unit…
❤3👍2🔥1
12 Aug 2025, 00:01 UTC320 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Regarding the tentacles of Cthulhu between Pokrovsk and Konstantinovka At the end of July, we wrote that this section would be indicative in terms of finding the key to the Ukrainian “drone wall.” And now Ukrainian sources are posting this map with numerous breakthroughs of ten or more kilometers in a day or two. According to enemy reports, there is practically no front here, Pokrovsk and Mirnograd are de facto sur…
❤4
11 Aug 2025, 23:05 UTC287 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Regarding the probable meeting in Alaska Almost all parties who express themselves vehemently on the topic are usually overwhelmed with so many emotions, fears, and hopes, and at the same time buried under such a thick layer of rumors, assumptions, versions, leaks, and fantasies that there are few rational words left on the subject. If you try not to fall into euphoria, depression, or hysteria, Putin's personal con…
👍5💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SLGAnalytica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Slavyangrad Analytica ☭” (@SLGAnalytica), 700 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SLGAnalytica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.