Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Проиграл ли СКА?

Channel

Проиграл ли СКА?

@SKAversuslose

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002284901646
TypeChannel
Username@SKAversuslose
DescriptionОтслеживаем результаты игр СКА. Telegram-канал несет исключительно юмористический характер, не стремится оскорбить или унизить кого-либо и направлен на популяризацию КХЛ и СКА.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SKAversuslose

Growth

417 August 2026 — 41 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:0241no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2541first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
14
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6241.9%
👏2214.9%
🤔128.11%
🏆106.76%
🔥85.41%
🤯85.41%
64.05%
👍64.05%
😢64.05%
🤣64.05%
💯10.676%
🤡10.676%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2025 to 21 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2025, 17:55 UTC87 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну что ж вы несёте!? Это была одна игра в 120 минут. Со счётом 9:1 выиграл СКА

😁3🔥2

11 Sept 2025, 19:23 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну вот сейчас наконец-то правильную информацию предоставили. Молодцы!

👍4

8 Sept 2025, 20:12 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вот откуда вы всё это берёте? Команды ж соревновались в количестве опыта главных тренеров на уровне КХЛ. А это просто стопроцентная победа СКА!

😁6

6 Sept 2025, 16:32 UTC69 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

КХЛ, вам тоже привет. Команды соревновались не в голах, а в Ларионовых! 2:0, победа СКА!

😁9

6 Sept 2025, 15:51 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мы делать привет оранжевый сайт. Даже мы уже проснулись. У вас как на замену вышел вратаря, которого, по-вашему, даже в заявке нет?

😁8

9 May 2025, 15:33 UTC146 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Но тут стоит вспомнить, что за команда играла в последнем финале Суперлиги в 2008-м году и первом финале Кубка Гагарина в 2009-м. И при этом проиграла оба финала.

😁4👏3

23 Apr 2025, 19:12 UTC175 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В 2018-м Омск играл в овертайме 7-го матча. Проиграл. В 2021-м Омск играл в овертайме 7-го матча. Выиграл. В 2025-м Омск снова в нём.

🏆5🔥2

16 Apr 2025, 08:33 UTC270 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Был ли перекрыт хотя б один из двух рекордов СКА-Невы? Правильно, нет. Даже тут два лучших результата на счёту Питера.

🏆5🤣1

14 Apr 2025, 17:09 UTC215 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Да их хоть что-то может остановить?

🤯6

13 Apr 2025, 13:44 UTC185 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пытаемся предугадать пресс-конференцию Козлова "Это хоккей. Это плей-офф. Игра длится 60 минут"

😁8

11 Apr 2025, 19:01 UTC194 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вы, кстати, что думали? Сезон для СКА закончился, и теперь мы не будем рассказывать об их победах? Нет уж. ЦСКА всегда будет первым! Сегодня у СКА сразу две победы! Александр Самонов обыграл сразу весь "Спартак". 4:1 Никита Серебряков оказался сильнее "Локомотива" с таким же счётом.

😁51

11 Apr 2025, 15:00 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

"Взломать их оборону сложнее, чем аккаунт Анатолия Голышева" Виталий Магранов тоже хорош

🤣5😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SKAversuslose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проиграл ли СКА?” (@SKAversuslose), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SKAversuslose.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.