3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 23:56
145
-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:13
146
no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:18
146
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3
42.9%
👍
2
28.6%
🌚
1
14.3%
🤯
1
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
{💠}~ 𝙵𝚎𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚅𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔘 - اتحاد قبایل وایکینگ از هم فروپاشید. یارلها، فرماندهان و خاندانهای کهن هر کدام ادعای پادشاهی شمال را کردند و سراسر اسکاندیناوی در آتش جنگ داخلی فرو رفته.
🔘 - تنها کسی که بتواند تمام سرزمینهای شمال را زیر یک پرچم متحد کند، لقب پادشاه شمال را به دست خواهد آورد و نامش تا ابد در تالار والهالا جاودانه خواهد شد.
━━━━━…
«اگه دیدی تو یه گودال افتادی، اول از همه دیگه بیل نزن!»
😎جان مارستون
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏
🍺"شجاعت در سرزمین بیرحم: داستان یک وسترن"🥃
🚬در دل بیابانهای سوزان و کوههای سر به فلک کشیده، قهرمانان واقعی زاده میشوند. در این گیم وسترن حماسی، با شجاعت به نبرد با دشمنان بپردازید و سرنوشت خود را رقم بزنید. هر شلیک شما نه تنها یک تیر، بلکه صدای طوفانی است که زمین را به لرزه درمیآورد. آیا آمادهاید تا در این دنیای بیرحم، نام خود را ج…
سلام به رفقای عزیز ، دوست خوبمون با توجه به شرایط کشور و نیاز خیلی از شما همراهان گل تصمیم گرفته با چیزایی که خودش وصل میشه همون هارو در اختیار شما هم بزاره تا داخل این وضعیت، همچنان دور هم باشیم
به امید روزهای بهتر ❤️🔥
🔥 عاشق نبردهای هوایی هستی؟ 🔥
تا حالا دوست داشتی خلبان یک جنگنده واقعی باشی و توی داگفایتهای نفسگیر شرکت کنی؟
این بازی دقیقاً همونه که دنبالش هستی 👇
🎮 بازی Silver Punk یک بازی شبیهساز متنی و واقعگرایانهست که توش وارد نبردهای هوایی میشی؛
از آسمونهای آتشین جنگ جهانی دوم 🌩
تا رویاروییهای مرگبار جنگ سرد ❄️
و حتی داگفایتهای مدرن با جنگندههای امروزی ⚡
🔹 همهچیز بر اساس منطق واقعی نبرد هواییه
🔹 تصمیمهات سرن…
رقابت سه روزه قبل از مسابقات اصلی
بر فراز صخرههای سپید و در برابر نسیم تند دریا، سپرها چون دیوار برنزین و نیزهها چون جنگلی از آذرخش برافراشته بودند؛ گامهای هوپلیتها بر خاک لرزه میانداخت و فریادشان، همچون طوفان درهها و معابد را در بر میگرفت، گویی خود ایزدان جنگ با آنها همقدم بودند و سرنوشت سرزمینهای یونان را به نوک نیزههایشان سپرده بودند.
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏
⭕رقابت اول : 29 ام ساعت 21
[◀️]جایزه : یک هیرو
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏
⭕رق…
🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇
👑(Philip II of Macedon)
🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇
معمار واقعی قدرت مقدونیه در قرن چهارم ق.م؛ طراح فالانکس مجهز به ساریسه، استاد اتحادهای سیاسی از راه ازدواج، و کسی که همزمان در میدان جنگ و پشت میز مذاکره میتوانست دشمن را شکست دهد. او هم مرزها را گسترد، هم ساختار اقتصادی-نظامیای ایجاد کرد که قرنها الهامبخش ماند.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
1️⃣ «ساریسههای بیانتها» (Unending Sarissas)
فالانکس مقدونی 30 درصد قدرت حمله روی زمین صاف و 25…
❤1
Signed 𝓶𝓪𝓱𝓭𝓲🌒⃟𓆃
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SISYPHUS_GAME. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,086,896 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SISYPHUS_GAME named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@valhalagame named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sctels named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐒𝐈𝐒𝐘𝐏𝐇𝐔𝐒𖢄ᴳᴬᴹᴱ” (@SISYPHUS_GAME), 145 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SISYPHUS_GAME.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
