Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

закрыт

@SIARjkl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002444658092
TypeChannel
Username@SIARjkl
Descriptionowner: @fotimaspit
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 1 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/SIARjkl

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:3441first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Videos
5
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,159 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 531233434564036575927523.7%
custom 544945843935486753224721.3%
custom 534363668147393540323920.6%
💋12110.4%
custom 5453906294601692978423.62%
custom 5330368123042292405383.28%
custom 5384283547588640869383.28%
custom 5413643347023644335363.11%
custom 5282956657666583015322.76%
custom 5262628354116309122312.67%
custom 5282843931954930761312.67%
custom 5282745409700127775292.50%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2024 to 4 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
952
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
202
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SIARjkl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2024 to 4 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 May 2025, 20:29 UTC315 viewsread 13 August 2026

канал закрыт, всем спасибо за сотрудничество. всех обнимаю целую

24 Apr 2025, 15:32 UTC517 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://t.me/SIAR7V Моя Фотима. Уже долго держится на плаву эстетера,нравится эта выдержка,несмотря на многочисленное желание закрыть канал. Она имеет свой стиль и подачу,по которым можно легко узнать именно её работу. Нравится умение работать с цветным материалом. В постах можно заметить акцент на многих деталях,но она делает это так,что все они складываются в одну картинку. Выделить один пост никак не могу,глазу пр

10 Apr 2025, 14:15 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

إذا كانت تريدك فقط ، فلا تقلق بشأن من يريدها.

27 Feb 2025, 14:27 UTC≈1,820 views68 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 526262835411630912215custom 545390629460169297815custom 533036812304229240514custom 538428354758864086914custom 541364334702364433510

22 Feb 2025, 17:50 UTC≈2,770 views113 reactions10 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌟Mount Everest ain't got shit on me.

custom 528295665766658301532custom 528284393195493076131custom 528274540970012777529custom 53303681230422924056custom 53842835475886408695custom 54539062946016929784custom 52626283541163091223custom 54136433470236443353

4 Feb 2025, 09:20 UTC≈2,920 views157 reactions202 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

My blackness is lighter than your behavior.

custom 531233434564036575952custom 534363668147393540345custom 544945843935486753244custom 53303681230422924054custom 52626283541163091223custom 53842835475886408693custom 54136433470236443353custom 54539062946016929783

30 Jan 2025, 11:10 UTC≈2,510 views144 reactions151 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😎-i say раз-два, say раз-два-три.

custom 531233434564036575946custom 534363668147393540343custom 544945843935486753242custom 54136433470236443354custom 52626283541163091223custom 53842835475886408693custom 54539062946016929783

26 Jan 2025, 13:13 UTC≈2,580 views145 reactions202 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

You $mokin dick if you think ima beg you to fwm

custom 544945843935486753246custom 531233434564036575945custom 534363668147393540342custom 53303681230422924053custom 53842835475886408693custom 54136433470236443353custom 54539062946016929783

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SIARjkl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,275,523 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“закрыт” (@SIARjkl), 41 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SIARjkl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.