SoCum power
🤣4👍1
Signed BotBot

Channel
@SF2Slaves
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003862617062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SF2Slaves |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 4 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SF2Slaves |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 86 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 87 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 88 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 85 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 85 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 26 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 17.1% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 🖕 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 6.58% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SoCum power
🤣4👍1
Signed BotBot
Today we have yet another slave who claimed 2.22.1 as their own. But not everyone knows that BlackStar, Script4fun, myself, and possibly others I forgot about (sorry) are in there.
🔥4❤2🤣2😁1
Signed BotBot
⚠️This channel engages in fraud and scams buyers. Do not buy anything there. The reviews are fake. ❗️https://t.me/devilsf2 (-1002847615535) The person doing this ❗️приоритет. (6918281127) ❗️DEVIL @zz10sf2 (7333418373) Канал занимается мошенничеством обманывая покупателей. Ничего не покупайте там. Отзывы фейковые
❤1🍌1👍1🤝1
Signed BotBot
🚨WARNING🚨 Akuza removed paid access again just because he wanted to. Also he leaked all of this customer's accounts that were used to log into the hack. Do not buy Ratinghack, just use ThrusterHack instead. Don't let clowns like Akuza scam you, take your cash, and leak your accounts.
❤3
Signed BotBot
Our arrogant dipshit is so jealous of Mit that he even copies his clans just to be at least a little bit like him. The lower the clan ID, the older it is
🤣6😁1
Signed BotBot
The scammer [Izana] constantly changes his username. Here's a permanent link to his Telegram account. Android IOS Ayugram don't let yourself be fooled Change history
🤣7🖕4💋2❤1
Signed BotBot
Time flies, and our dirty scammer is still buying fake followers 😂🤡
😁5
Signed BotBot
Another bitch
💘5🤣3❤2😁2
Signed BotBot
🤣
💋1
Signed BotBot
He doesn't even know how "his" ratinghack works.
🤡4❤2
Signed BotBot
Listen i will explain when you code rating hack 12k tap nekki has anti-cheat system that won't allow more than the boss health, means if you play boss with 12k+ it will tap 12k and stops but if you play with less than 12k boss like volcano it will tap automatically 1757 instead of 12000 because the game doesn't allow more than boss health in single tap only if you spam with rating hack the fight value to double the r…
❤2🤣2
Signed BotBot
Deleted. months ago
Signed BotBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SF2Slaves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 498,719 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SF2 Slaves” (@SF2Slaves), 86 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SF2Slaves.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.