Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ꮯʙяᴛᴏй ϶ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴛᴵᶰᶠᵒ

@SEX_TOT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

170subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003389663463
TypeChannel
Username@SEX_TOT
DescriptionНе причастны к рейд деятельности.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SEX_TOT

Growth

1708 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 170 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 170 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:458 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:45170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
31
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53503266513832118711317.6%
custom 54290901453641173251216.2%
custom 53506068163948961281013.5%
custom 5204016898227865728810.8%
custom 542488964587379585579.46%
custom 601477187032947665856.76%
custom 536624385601676349545.41%
custom 543605257511372773445.41%
custom 601471981962081643345.41%
custom 522693066471613958734.05%
custom 545395908833971816234.05%
custom 545655493221368137911.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SEX_TOT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 February 2026 to 25 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2026, 19:21 UTC108 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ищем союзы. Рейд и снос деятельность - отказ. @KRES7TIK

Signed FAS6REP.

21 Mar 2026, 18:24 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026

Мы вышли с отдыха и вновь начинаем работать. Дайте буста кому не сложно.

Signed FAS6REP.

10 Mar 2026, 15:28 UTC218 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: чон 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.sну наш.

custom 53506068163948961284custom 54248896458737958553custom 54290901453641173253custom 53503266513832118712custom 52040168982278657281

Signed Лицемер

10 Mar 2026, 13:26 UTC193 views15 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Вильям 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s тигры.

custom 54290901453641173256custom 52040168982278657283custom 53503266513832118713custom 52269306647161395871custom 53506068163948961281custom 54248896458737958551

Signed .

8 Mar 2026, 22:10 UTC153 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Вильям 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s забыли про эти строчки.

custom 53503266513832118715custom 52040168982278657281custom 52269306647161395871custom 53506068163948961281custom 54248896458737958551custom 54290901453641173251

Signed .

8 Mar 2026, 19:42 UTC129 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отныне мы возрощаем наше название "святой эскорт" На дертикс так же остаётся над патент.

custom 52040168982278657283custom 54248896458737958552custom 54290901453641173252custom 52269306647161395871custom 53503266513832118711custom 53506068163948961281

Signed Лицемер

6 Mar 2026, 20:12 UTC156 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Вильям 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s коллаб.

custom 53503266513832118711custom 53506068163948961281custom 53662438560167634951custom 54360525751137277341custom 60147198196208164331

Signed .رجل ميت

6 Mar 2026, 19:18 UTC120 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Вильям 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s секси.

custom 53503266513832118711custom 53662438560167634951custom 54360525751137277341custom 60147718703294766581

Signed .رجل ميت

6 Mar 2026, 17:16 UTC98 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Вильям 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s. вы думали мы сдохли? Нет.

custom 53506068163948961281custom 53662438560167634951custom 54539590883397181621custom 54565549322136813791custom 60147198196208164331custom 60147718703294766581

Signed .رجل ميت

3 Mar 2026, 13:27 UTC145 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗱𝗶𝗱: Оливия 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮: Не наша 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: – P.s. половина участников с этого видео уже не состоит в чате.*

custom 54360525751137277342custom 53506068163948961281custom 53662438560167634951custom 54539590883397181621custom 60147198196208164331custom 60147718703294766581

Signed ̶Г̶̶Р̶̶Е̶̶Ш̶̶Н̶̶Ы̶̶Й̶ ̶А̶̶Н̶̶Г̶̶Е̶̶Л̶̶О̶̶К̶.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SEX_TOT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 901,753 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ꮯʙяᴛᴏй ϶ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴛᴵᶰᶠᵒ” (@SEX_TOT), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SEX_TOT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.