Channel
@SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002626683541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 64 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 63 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 62 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 62 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
170 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 59 | 34.7% | |
| custom 5472220786771125935 | 34 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5355207662671787282 | 28 | 16.5% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 4.12% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 3.53% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.35% | |
| custom 5260273354828434709 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| custom 5355278632711389075 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.588% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩Обожемойприкиньтеда. Долгострой длинною в два месяца закончен, наконец закончила несчастную коммишк для замечательного теоретика по дельте, да, всем спасибо, я спала пять часов, надо проспаться.❣️ [ #Арт #Коммиш #Дидж ]
custom 54722207867711259352🍓1
- Нагло сворую вопрос, потому почему бы и нет?? Что вам нравится в моём стиле больше всего, да и чем вас он может зацепить? 🌟 Хотелось бы очень послушать
🍓3custom 53552076626717872821custom 54722207867711259351
- Смотреть на целующихся Нетисов без СМС и регистрации, лмаооо 🌟 Люблю их очень, особенно в чиби версии, ОНИ ТАКИМИ МИЛЫМИ ПОЛУЧИЛИСЬ Ну тупа ЯиКто
custom 53552076626717872826🍓4custom 54722207867711259353🔥1
🤩 𖦹 ׂ 𓈒 ˚₊‧꒰ა ☆ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚ хей, итс ми, итс верити . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁ ⟡ ݁ . ⊹ ₊ ݁. #art #Minecraft
🍓1💋1
хз че писать но мммм клеопатра будто в меня вселилась такой прекрасный рендеринг согласитесь да)))
🍓2💋1💘1
- С.. Салли это правда ты.. П.. Прости меня.. Мне жаль, что я не смогла тебя спасти..
👍2🍓1
- Угадайте что?? Дааа,снова Ревриттен (но надолго ли? 😧) Finally, я смогла закончить эту идею с Чаркэллями. А то давно думала их нарисовать, но всë почему-то откладывала это, лл Но, к счастью, всë получилось и они вышли такими милашками, я не могу. Я ОЧЕНЬ довольна результатом 🥺 Может быть я буду почаще их рисовать, кто знаеттт
custom 547222078677112593510💘5❤4🍓2👍1custom 53552076626717872821
- Это что... РЕВРИТТЕН??? Не верю 🌟 Дадаа, что-то уж очень захотелось закончить эти небольшие редизы, которые лежали не законченными. Но Сишель смиловаласб и реально закончила это 💀💀💀 ОЙЙ, И ЗНАЕТЕ, мне это ооочень понравилось рисовать, возможно эту троицу я буду почаще рисовать, хихи
🍓10custom 54722207867711259356custom 53552076626717872825👍1
- And с небольшим обновлением тг прем реакций Что-то захотелось их внезапно сменить 🤩
custom 53552076626717872828custom 54722207867711259356❤4🍓1
- YAYYYY, Наконец-то ваша Сишелька смогла дорисовать этот долгожданный арт, а то эти экзамены всë время мешали, ну настоящий piece of shit 🌟 Ноооо всë прошло хорошо,и теперь я наконец-то могу дальше рисовать любимых Нетисов 💙🩷 Долго думала над этой идеей с ними и вроде как вышло не так уж и плохо как я предполагала У меня был этап от ненависти до любви к этому арту, лмаооо
🍓8custom 53552076626717872827custom 54722207867711259356🔥1
- Sorry guys, что несколько дней никакого актива, но я стараюсь, честно. Вот вам даже небольшой спойлер скетча от меня, лл. Постараюсь закончить в ближайшее время 🌟 По крайней мере я на это очень надеюсь
❤7🍓5❤🔥3🍌1🔥1
- Oh, внезапный соц опрос, есть ли у вас подобные песонажи, от которых у вас есть такие тёплые воспоминания?? 🍥
🍓4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𑀝ᥙɯᥱ᧘ь дᥲⲙᥴκᥙ᥊ ᥴᥱρдᥱц уᴦ᧐нщᥙцᥲ🍧” (@SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove), 64 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SEASHELL_exe_Starfiremylove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.