Channel name was changed to «[ЗАКРЫТО]︵ 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏. .𝙀𝘾𝙃𝔒𝙀𝙎ᶫᶦᶠᵉ»

Channel
[ЗАКРЫТО]︵ 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏. .𝙀𝘾𝙃𝔒𝙀𝙎ᶫᶦᶠᵉ
@SE1ife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003229098765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SE1ife |
| Description | 𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖 @SE1nfo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SE1ife |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 37 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 97
- Videos
- 48
- Links
- 114
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5246908387265905512 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5312370049703502914 | 12 | 20.7% | |
| custom 5249154302974393793 | 11 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5870536835486193445 | 6 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5346179495386701554 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5379977920183806931 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5330167814357545301 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5355299841259892306 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.72% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
[ЗАКРЫТО]︵ 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏. .𝙀𝘾𝙃𝔒𝙀𝙎ᶫᶦᶠᵉ pinned «Приветствую всех союзников и участников!! У меня снова для вас важная новость. На этом starlight echoes точно все И нет, здесь не будет никакого подвоха с нью эрой. Мы действительно закрываемся Причина кроется в том, что я действительно устала и начинаю…»
Приветствую всех союзников и участников!! У меня снова для вас важная новость. На этом starlight echoes точно все И нет, здесь не будет никакого подвоха с нью эрой. Мы действительно закрываемся Причина кроется в том, что я действительно устала и начинаю медленно, но уверенно выгорать. С нью очень большая проблема, их попросту нет, соответственно и активом не пахнет. Изначально я думала провести перенабор, но потом по…
custom 524690838726590551211custom 52491543029743937935custom 53123700497035029143custom 53301678143575453011custom 53461794953867015541
Signed 𝗂𝖽𝗄 ⌗𝑆𝐸ᵒʷⁿ
Коллаб… Дайте нам коллаб 🙏🏻🙏🏻 Писать сюда @lul1an9e
Signed 𝗂𝖽𝗄 ⌗𝑆𝐸ᵒʷⁿ
Проверяем вашу удачу!! (У меня закончился прем)
- 🩷10%
- 🩷25%
- 🩷33%
- 🩷20%
- 🩷13%
- 🩷0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💘1custom 52469083872659055121custom 53123700497035029141
АМЭМХХС, крутая порода, нам очень нравится результат!!!!!!
💘1custom 53123700497035029141custom 58705368354861934451
ⁿᵉʷ ᵘⁿᶦᵒⁿ 🤩🤩🤩 🎀 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗆𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗐: 🍷ⅅɛɑᎿℏ ⅈɳ Ꮏℏɛ ɑƒᎿɛɼɳσσɳ 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝗆𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎'𝗅𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗏𝖾 me ⬜⬜⬜info | life⬜⬜ #𝖭𝖾𝗐𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖲𝖤
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝖧𝖺𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖽 - 𝖢𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝖦𝗋𝖾𝗒 [🎵] 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟₀₂.₀₃.₂₀₂₆ [🪷] 𝖴𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗈𝖿 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝖲𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗄 𝗈𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 “𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒅“ 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌 info | life 𝖡𝗎𝗍 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝖺𝗅𝗐𝖺𝗒𝗌 𝖻𝖾 . . 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #𝖭𝖾𝗐𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖲𝖤
𝖧𝖺𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖽 - 𝖢𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝖦𝗋𝖾𝗒 [🎵] 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟₀₂.₀₃.₂₀₂₆ [🪷] 𝖴𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗁 𝗈𝖿 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝖲𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗄 𝗈𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 “ℳ𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗂“ 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌 info | life 𝖡𝗎𝗍 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝖺𝗅𝗐𝖺𝗒𝗌 𝖻𝖾 . . 𝗪𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #𝖭𝖾𝗐𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖲𝖤
💘1custom 53461794953867015541custom 58705368354861934451
Sticker, posted without a caption
[ЗАКРЫТО]︵ 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏. .𝙀𝘾𝙃𝔒𝙀𝙎ᶫᶦᶠᵉ pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SE1ife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Проверяем вашу удачу!! (У меня закончился прем)
- 🩷10%
- 🩷25%
- 🩷33%
- 🩷20%
- 🩷13%
- 🩷0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 3 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 594,121 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SE1ife named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ЗАКРЫТО]︵ 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙇𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏. .𝙀𝘾𝙃𝔒𝙀𝙎ᶫᶦᶠᵉ” (@SE1ife), 37 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SE1ife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.