Channel
@SDGZpB9
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
387subscribers
+130 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003960288632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SDGZpB9 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SDGZpB9 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 387 | +115 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 272 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 257 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 137 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道！ ❤️以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 1️⃣仁济改文件. 2️⃣小月改文件. 3️⃣HTY改文件. 4️⃣公益内核破解. 5️⃣TG高速公益代理. 6️⃣期九期改文件. 以下为互推赞助商⬇️ ‼️😙还在当直装仔被嘲笑吗 别人已经找教父来买Root机当大牛 ‼️ 点击一键加入查看教父root机 惩戒他人,保护自己 开户查档专用软件 100%秒出14亿全国人口数据库/免费开户 ⚠️户籍猎手已公益
👍1
⚠️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ♥️秋辞互推挑战全网最强互管 100人以上都可以参与🔤 ✉️你还在求爷爷告奶奶找别人要神秘代码吗？ 🔗一键加入📱优质频道 🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰 本人频道 1️⃣飞天稳定战神的直装 2️⃣无敌高跳最强改文件 3️⃣实体美化最强改文件 PUBG账号源头卡网 ⬇️ https://4xg.66url.cn/qhN 加入互推要求 频道1k+ 机器人 @QIUCIHUTUIBOT 🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️ ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ (如果你加入了其他文件夹 请尽快退出 都是诈骗！)
👍1
有没有人要这个渠道？24拿走https://t.me/Z789BB
Channel name was changed to «秋罗数据号批发【导航页】主渠道看置顶»
秋罗数据号批发【导航页】主渠道看置顶 pinned «秋罗数据号批发商最低的价格拿最质量的号别再花冤枉钱买那种大主播的高价格号了在他那里买一个，可以在我这里买10个 禁玩器 验号器 上号器 上号器使用教程 很多就不一一发了进渠道看置顶看置顶 主渠道 @XLNBSJH 副渠道 @XLNB666SJH 卡网 https://fkli.cc/9ff»
秋辞互推（2026年08月20日）频道推荐 和泉纱雾 · 主频道 幕屿飞机业务/飞机账号/僵尸🧟♀️/会员代开/礼物代购 七辰官方频道 七小辰官方频道 七辰改文件🇨🇳 七辰的小窝 七辰项目导航[唯一正版] 七辰内核主频道 纵情数据号(免费数据号) 雾鱼直装官方频道 百度和平直装(公益) 开心的泛滥小屋 秋小鹤八级号【官方正版】 🍀𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑎𝑡 作弊频道 小九号商频道 GYX·MOD 七辰的朋友圈 和粟薰子八级号 七辰主频道 顾北高质量数据号【免费数据号】 魔芋爽资源分享 和泉纱雾反馈频道 秋罗项目工作室 和泉纱雾 · 副频道 高速代理 | 飞机代理 | 公益代理 和粟熏子主频道 【先看置顶】 路飞の封号频道 厚焰授权号(授权号超级大降价) JINX CHEAT 作恶多端数据号『高质量首选🎉』 和粟薰子聊天群 雾岛董香数据号（进频道就送） RKR直装官方频道 北斗云互联 上善若水万能搜索🔍 作恶多端数据号『高质量首选…
秋罗数据号批发商最低的价格拿最质量的号别再花冤枉钱买那种大主播的高价格号了在他那里买一个，可以在我这里买10个 禁玩器 验号器 上号器 上号器使用教程 很多就不一一发了进渠道看置顶看置顶 主渠道 @XLNBSJH 副渠道 @XLNB666SJH 卡网 https://fkli.cc/9ff
秋罗容器直装 配置多款解密 内置断点绕过检测 各种娱乐功能应有尽有，娱乐性最顶尖 反馈联系 @XLNB6K
对呀都这质量了那你们为什么不买
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
开到极品号的请反馈 @XLNB6K 反馈送你一个反馈十个送你十个 重复两个以上找我问题要是多的话也找我补 卡网 https://fkli.cc/9ff
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @SDGZpB9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,458,367 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SDGZpB9 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秋罗批发市场” (@SDGZpB9), 387 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SDGZpB9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.