Channel
@SAL_VN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003954605752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SAL_VN |
| Description | Cr аватарки: TAMAKUZ Внимание: не гарантирую канон. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SAL_VN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 34 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 34 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 35 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 183 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
54 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5330512919274728666 | 17 | 31.5% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 29.6% | |
| custom 5332473189593263648 | 12 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5332823293852397573 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5332585498693085655 | 2 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 (@DrMasacrikVN) 🌟🌟ᅠᅠᅠ @SAL_VN 🩸 — Как я и говорил. Выходит, моим долгом станет познакомить тебя с когда-то весьма примитивной для меня вещью. ♦️ В одно мгновение образ акулы пропал, а вместо неё стояла уже человекоподобная фигура, которую выдавали лишь хвост и плавник на голове. Одна из рук находилась за спиной, а второй он щёлкнул пальцами (хотя для перехода из одной формы в другую это было совсем не обяза…
#𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 (@DrMasacrikVN) 🌟🌟ᅠᅠᅠ @SAL_VN 🩸 ᅠВопрос про воду Сал считал странным, но всё же, по мере своего плавания, он задавался им. Помимо этого, он начал вспоминать моменты, когда в морском Королевстве вода ещё не была окрашена кровью и присутствовала приятная атмосфера, которая с этим местом сравниваться даже не могла. У них было лишь одно общее: что морское королевство при Принцессе Уоми, что этот пляж, раздражали…
#𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 (@DrMasacrikVN) 🌟🌟ᅠᅠᅠ @SAL_VN 🩸 ᅠСал продолжал смотреть на Масарика. Тот явно был шокирован, но недоумение, походу быстро прошло, что не могло не радовать акулу. Правда, причин уже буквально подойти к другу это Салу не дало и он продолжил находиться в воде. — Конечно! Да и не то, чтобы я планировал дать тебе видеть меня в таком виде, чистейшая случайность. Но гораздо больше я не хочу выходить из воды в тако…
👀1custom 53305129192747286661custom 53324731895932636481
#𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 (@DrMasacrikVN) 🌟🌟ᅠᅠᅠ @SAL_VN 🩸 ᅠСолнечные лучи словно игрались с мягко плескающейся водой. Вода хоть и нагрелась от Солнца, но в ней Было гораздо приятнее находиться, чем на песке. ᅠПока доктор пытался искать "нападение", оно уже с дружелюбной (хоть и незаметной от слова "совсем") улыбкой, наполненой пятью, а то и шестью рядами клыков. Подплывало оно не сильно спеша, ведь Масакрик вглядывался в бескрайние в…
👀2custom 53305129192747286661custom 53324731895932636481
Channel name was changed to «𝘉𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘼𝙢𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙧。(𝗦𝖺𝗅) /𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓»
🌟 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Лето, отдых, море... В жизни даже самого жестокого злодея и воинственного героя должно быть время для расслабления и... Пляжного эпизода! Или... Это уже было? В прочем, не важно! В этот раз будет ещё лучше чем тогда! Теперь, мы можем позволить себе целый курорт возле моря: Пляж, отель лучшего класса, фуршеты и самое главное — живое общение! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 …
🤩 #𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ᅠ🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 t.me/SAL_VN / 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐦𝐞? ᅠБилл Сайфер? Видел такого, но к его ак называемой "компашке" внимания я не придаю. Так что мне жаль, те слухи не замечал. ᅠНезваный гость наших обсуждений в личных снова собирается устроить что-то "грандиозное"? Замечательно. Забыл позвать меня туда в первый раз, забудет и во второй. Так что, мне без разницы. Тем более, мероприятия подобного плана у него не такие цепляю…
👀1
🤩 #𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ᅠ🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 t.me/SAL_VN / 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐦𝐞? ᅠАх, ну разумеется. Остальные не в рабочем моральном состоянии, пока незаменимый посол выполняет всю работу за них. Оно сразу видно, кто служит во благо Её Высочеству, а кому просто поколупаться в красном и отвратительном охота. И что же мне теперь делать с этими лентяями, пока одна чётко следит за вторым, второй, в то же время, пинает фотографии с его собственным позоро…
👀1
🤩 #𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ᅠ🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 t.me/SAL_VN / 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐦𝐞? ᅠЧто же я тут вижу? Ах, старые добрые лица. Воздержусь от лицемерия: не очень то и скучал по всем вам. А вот как вы там, меня не особо волнует. Впрочем, был бы рад узнать об этом. Как вижу, кто-то соскучился настолько, что ушёл в такой же отдых от социальных сетей! Согласен, ну а кому ещё изливать свою душу, скучающую по тому, что бы поизбивать всяких рыбёшек? Конечно же…
👀6custom 53305129192747286665custom 53324731895932636484
...⏳ ❌ ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❌❌ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔣Страницы Сала и Эдди Брока разморожены! ➿➿➿➿➿ #ВЫХОД_ИЗ_РЕСТА
custom 53305129192747286665
Channel name was changed to «𝘚𝘦𝘢 𝘰𝘧 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘼𝙢𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙧。(𝗦𝖺𝗅)»
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SAL_VN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 386,562 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SAL_VN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘉𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘼𝙢𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙧。(𝗦𝖺𝗅) /𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓” (@SAL_VN), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SAL_VN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.