Video message, posted without a caption
🙏50😢2

Channel
@Ryzhaya_mom
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,688subscribers
+1,800 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001655597221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ryzhaya_mom |
| Description | https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6793335619290c0f93658ea8 Мама| Блогер| Предприниматель 💃🏽 «Прорыв года» 🚀 по мнению Stars Bloggers 🏆 Построили квартиру мечты 💫Создаю уют⭐️Путешествующая семейка 🧳 Обзоры WB/Ozon Сот-во https://t.me/darya_7737 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ryzhaya_mom |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
26,500 average views per post against 32,688 subscribers — an engagement rate of 80.9%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 343,900 |
| Mature posts only | 80.9% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 32,688 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 7,904 channels · p10 2.39% · p25 4.93% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.0% · p90 37.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.152th percentile · 7.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.03% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 32,688 | -50 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 32,738 | -41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 32,779 | +1,420 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 31,359 | -47 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 31,406 | +1,508 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 29,898 | -990 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 30,888 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 30,888 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (10 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 343,900 |
| Reactions total | 3,042 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,454 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,751 | 50.7% | |
| 👍 | 408 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 397 | 11.5% | |
| 🤩 | 185 | 5.36% | |
| 😍 | 169 | 4.89% | |
| 👏 | 92 | 2.66% | |
| 😢 | 90 | 2.61% | |
| 🎉 | 67 | 1.94% | |
| 👌 | 57 | 1.65% | |
| 🙏 | 50 | 1.45% | |
| 🤬 | 50 | 1.45% | |
| 💯 | 48 | 1.39% | |
| 😨 | 28 | 0.811% | |
| 🤯 | 25 | 0.724% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 0.695% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.116% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 0.116% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.087% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.029% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.029% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHq2J7T | 1 | 29 July 2026 | 29 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Video message, posted without a caption
🙏50😢2
Проломил гипсовую стену😳 Это наши «идеальные квартиранты»… Сам замазал тяп-ляп, покрасил белой краской (стена была зеленой) и поставил перед фактом съезда 🤬 Это вообще норма что ли?! Нанести ущерб имуществу и свалить!
🤬50😨26❤16👍5
Депутат Госдумы назвал женщин «неполноценными» Заявление депутата Госдумы от Курганской области Ильтякова о том, что женщины «неполноценные люди», еще и со ссылкой на Библию — это абсурд. Такие выражения недопустимы и оскорбительны, особенно со стороны народного избранника, представителя власти. И ладно, если бы это была случайно сказанная, необдуманная фраза. Такие выражения от Ильтякова женщины России слышат уже…
❤30💯19🤨4🔥1
Иногда увлекаюсь так работой, что забываю пообедать😅 Чтобы не тратить время на готовку, заказываю любимые блюда через Яндекс Еду в подборке Обедомания👌🏻 Через 15мин я уже села обедать☺️ И уже дальше побежала заниматься остальными делами
❤227👍84🔥13💯1🖕1
Группа Мантера ищет самого уставшего человека в России! Главный приз – 2х-недельный отдых в Сочи! Чувствуете, что силы на нуле? Отпуск всё откладывается, а задач все больше и больше? Тогда вы – наш идеальный герой. Мы знаем, что в России растёт число людей с хронической усталостью, поэтому решили действовать и запустили поиск «самого уставшего среди уставших», чтобы подарить настоящую перезагрузку. ➡️Все просто: …
❤275🔥155🤩11💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤25👏16🔥16👍15🎉13😍1
Начался мой курс LPG по маслу Нужно выдержать 10 сеансов 😅 Это не про похудение ☝🏻 Это выгнать лишнюю воду. Отличный лимфодренаж 👍🏻 И если есть где-то целлюлит, то результат обеспечен 🔥 Кожа разглаживается, всё подтягивается ☺️ Могут оставаться синячки, как после засоса😅 но быстро проходят Пробовали аппаратные массажи?
❤191🤩83🔥41👍25👏18🎉16
Video message, posted without a caption
❤266👍27❤🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
😢88🤯25😨2
🐾 Раньше после прогулки я просто мыла Зарке лапы водой. Казалось, что этого вполне достаточно. Но если задуматься, за прогулку лапы собирают не только грязь и песок, но и пыль, бактерии, реагенты, остатки того, во что питомец случайно наступил. 😅 ✨ Поэтому решила попробовать специальную пенку для мытья лап — и теперь это обязательная часть ухода после каждой прогулки. 🫧 Мне понравилось, что пенка легко наносится, а…
❤331😍163👌41🤩19🕊4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥29❤23💯2
Всё, теперь точно повзрослел 🥹 Макс уехал в свой первый лагерь 😍 в 8 лет! Посмотрим, сколько одежды вернется назад😅 И какие ещё будут казусы в этом возрасте, когда нет мамы рядом🙈 Вы когда детей отправили в свой первый лагерь? Были какие-то истории?😁
👍216👏31🎉23❤21🔥16😍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Ryzhaya_mom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,125,850 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ryzhaya_mom” (@Ryzhaya_mom), 32,688 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ryzhaya_mom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.