Narra will prob run with an other token later 100% with a smarter dev, sorry didn't check that dev

Channel
Ryko's Convictions
@Rykalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
983subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002187861520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rykalls |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rykalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 983 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 991 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 998 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,002 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,003 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 1,007 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 1,008 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 1,010 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 1,011 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 1,012 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,011 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 1,011 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Didn't check this shit fees are messed up the stupid dev didn't redirect to the agt, mb not used to this shit feature
Oh nvm they do have a com, it's even better
👍1
Got in this dip at 10k No com yet but trending page + tweets every sec, it should run if no vamps DKPj37rkqafQapqCnnxoGXrSg2pqatzRTkZxYZajpump
Both last 2 calls did 2x Not crazy so I'll shill on my alt to train more and then I'll drop here some CAs in couple days. As you've seen every shit i post survive for hours because they are trends that's why I trade these type of tokens instead of fighting with dumbs on bonding or pre bond, risk still exists but it's much safer than other strategies.
👍2
People start realizing.. x2 alrdy I CTO'ed 1 narra since i came back went from 8k to 130k but this one is probably bigger. It may retrace now then run later, but watching top holders who holding for hours makes me giga bullish on it. Good to cook in a market full of larps & dumps
Just paid dex for it, I hope i get respected lol
👍1
Lore is so well that it's getting pumped even without com lol, it sucks i haven't much supply, but I'll add more on every dip then make a com if no one does
👍3
Just noticed there is still no com for it lol, didn't have the time to load enough to run it i just aped 1sol, if no one run it i'll accumulate on the 10-12k floor and get dex, hope it dips more
👍3
Don't buy higher, be patient, it should swing in this range and probably run Lore : https://x.com/i/trending/2033693088896389541
5qZod5srbAecRhNDzZDUrnfBdnsxrRfQ6peeDFy3pump 14k rn Load 10-15k avg
that agent feature is broken lol idk why it stopped buying, at least tokens with a trend hold their floor for hours, that's why i focus this type of tokens, much less risky than other shitters. expected better call but it was a good 2x frontrun
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rykalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PhanesHub · 47,533
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ryko's Convictions” (@Rykalls), 983 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rykalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.