Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Русское оружие

Channel

Русское оружие

@RussianArms

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,270subscribers

-149 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812447828
TypeChannel
Username@RussianArms
Description⭐️Следим за тактико-техническими особенностями применения современного вооружения в зоне СВО 🔥Прорабатываем сценарии развития оперативно-тактической ситуации Реклама: 📩 [email protected] А+ vk.cc/cJhs11 № 6376290907
Created30 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RussianArms

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RussianArms/28450 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC@VictoryDrones/618926 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC1.0068 minutes
@RussianArms/28646 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC@VictoryDrones/6251415 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC1.0021 hours
@RussianArms/28820 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC@VictoryDrones/6292722 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC1.005.0 hours
@RussianArms/28821 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC@VictoryDrones/6292822 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC1.004.8 hours
@RussianArms/28883 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC@VictoryDrones/6317024 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC1.002.4 hours
@RussianArms/28983 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC@VictoryDrones/6344429 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC1.006.9 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@VictoryDrones42 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006.6 hoursthis entry (42–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 267 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @MariaBerlinska. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,27013,41913,344.56 August 2026 — 13,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,418 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,417 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,413 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,403 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,392 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,398 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,391 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,383 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,385 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,387 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,386 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,384 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,376 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,378 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,381 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,378 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,375 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,376 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,370 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,364 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,355 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,354 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,345 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,348 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,343 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,339 subscribers24 September 2026 — 13,337 subscribers3 October 2026 — 13,312 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,302 subscribers12 October 2026 — 13,284 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,292 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,291 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,286 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,289 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,286 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,284 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,288 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,281 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,277 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,279 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,281 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,284 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,286 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,280 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,284 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,285 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,281 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,274 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,275 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,277 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,283 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,284 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,278 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,276 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,274 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,270 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net -149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,248–13,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:3413,270-4
9 Nov 2026, 08:1713,274-2
7 Nov 2026, 21:0913,276-2
6 Nov 2026, 18:1813,278-6
5 Nov 2026, 17:3613,284+1
4 Nov 2026, 16:2913,283+6
3 Nov 2026, 16:0513,277+2
2 Nov 2026, 18:3613,275+1
1 Nov 2026, 17:3913,274-7
31 Oct 2026, 15:0813,281-4
29 Oct 2026, 08:4713,285+1
28 Oct 2026, 09:4713,284+4
27 Oct 2026, 11:1113,280-6
26 Oct 2026, 11:5513,286+2
25 Oct 2026, 10:4013,284+3
24 Oct 2026, 10:1013,281+2
23 Oct 2026, 10:4013,279+2
22 Oct 2026, 11:0913,277-4
21 Oct 2026, 07:0513,281-7
20 Oct 2026, 05:5613,288first reading

Engagement

466 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 13,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 466 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held466 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total38,477
Reactions total302
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈16,800
Videos
≈7,100
Links
≈11,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
51m 15s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,514 reactions across 281 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍89725.5%
🤬74921.3%
❤58816.7%
🔥37410.6%
🤔3199.08%
😁912.59%
💩671.91%
👏531.51%
💯521.48%
👎481.37%
🙏391.11%
🤪330.939%
🎉300.854%
🤣240.683%
😡200.569%
🥱150.427%
✍120.341%
🍾100.285%
🥴100.285%
🫡100.285%
22 further kinds732.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 283 of the 466 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,514 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 466 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 466 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RussianArms. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 466 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC967 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @brandrussiaPhoto

Роботизированный комплекс "Штурм" https://brandrussia.online/fn_1983086.html Беспилотный танк "Штурм" оснащён 125-мм пушкой с укороченным стволом, бульдозерным ножом и круговой защитой от гранатомётов. ОДнако эффективность машины критически зависит от устойчивости каналов связи и точности навигации. #Россия 🇷🇺 «Бренды России» ▶️ Читайте нас в MAX

🔥9🤔7

9 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,280 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @bizmag_onlinePhoto

Рубильник Пентагона: эксперты - о превращении Starlink из интернета в оружие с применением на Украине и в Иране https://business-magazine.online/fn_1989520.html Конец октября - начало ноября 2026 года стали, пожалуй, самыми насыщенными неделями в «спутниковой» повестке со времён начала украинского конфликта. Российские эксперты и блогеры в эти недели фактически сошлись в одном: спутниковый интернет из «инфраструктур…

🤬9❤1

9 Nov 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,380 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

J-20 «Могучий дракон»: китайцы рассказали, во что превращается их флагман ГоссМИ КНР поделились деталями эволюции семейства малозаметных истребителей пятого поколения. Главные новости — двигатели, аэродинамика и сенсоры у одноместного J-20A, плюс двухместный J-20S, который меняет саму концепцию применения. Двигатель. Ключевая веха — переход на собственные ТРДДФ WS-15 тягой до 18 000 кгс на форсаже (вместо промежуточн…

👍6🤔6❤5💩1🔥1🤬1

8 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,530 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Иран снял лимит в 2000 км: чем бьёт и что это меняет Официальный представитель КСИР бригадный генерал Хосейн Мохеби заявил: «Ограничение дальности ракет для Ирана снято». По его словам, республика продемонстрирует новые возможности «на практике», а в асимметричной войне способна ударить там, где противник не ожидает. Решение — прямое следствие указания верховного лидера Моджтабы Хаменеи от 31 октября: отвечать на люб…

❤23👍6🤔2

8 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,600 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Дань‑Т»: что известно о новом боеприпасе и его связях с «Бандеролью» 🔥 В сентябре на авиасалоне в Эль‑Аламейне (Египет) «Ростех» представил реактивный боеприпас «Дань‑Т». Его фишка — малогабаритный реактивный двигатель: после отделения от носителя боеприпас летит автономно. Заявленная дальность — несколько сотен километров. Пуск возможен с самолётов и вертолётов. 6 ноября Минобороны РФ впервые показало кадры боевого…

👍24❤6

6 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,170 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🛡 ЗАК-30 «Цитадель» станет мобильным «Боевой модуль, а также радиолокационные и оптические системы обнаружения теперь установлены на автомобильном шасси. Это позволит оперативно перебрасывать ЗАК на разные объекты, требующие защиты от средств воздушного нападения. Также подвижный вариант системы обеспечит мобильные огневые группы расширенными возможностями поражения целей», – сказали в Госкорпорации Ростех. «Цитадель…

❤21👍14🫡1🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,060 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @brandrussiaPhoto

Зенитно-пулемётный комплекс "Калитка-КА" https://brandrussia.online/fn_1983069.html Комплекс "Калитка-КА" вооружён 7,62-мм пулемётом и способен поражать дроны-камикадзе на расстоянии до 800 метров с помощью системы наведения с искусственным интеллектом. #Россия 🇷🇺 «Бренды России» ▶️ Читайте нас в MAX

👍19❤5👎1🔥1🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,960 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚀 Индия хочет тульский «Панцирь». Сообщают Тульские новости Дели обсуждает с Москвой закупку 52 зенитных ракетно-пушечных комплексов «Панцирь-С1М» разработки тульского КБ приборостроения. 13 машин планируют получить напрямую из России, ещё 39 — собрать по лицензии на индийских предприятиях в рамках программы Make in India. 📌 Чем хорош «Панцирь-С1М» по сравнению с базовой моделью: ▪️ Дальность поражения выросла с 2…

❤15👍11👎3💩2🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC≈2,990 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

❗️⚡️Израиль и Кипр значительно развивают военное сотрудничество. В рамках достигнутого соглашения Израиль передаст Кипру новый патрульный корабль, что подчеркивает нарастающее военное партнерство между двумя странами. Корабль будет построен израильской компанией Israel Shipyards с использованием высоких стандартов и новейших технологий. Он будет оснащен современными военно-морскими системами, такими как зенитные и ар…

🤔6❤5

31 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,200 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026

📷❗️В недавнем опубликованном отчете ОВМС НАТО отмечается, что постоянная военно-морская группа №1 (SNMG1) зафиксировала посредством своих авиационных многорежимных РЛС и оптико-электронных комплексов в низкоуровнемвом ТВ-диапазоне присутствие российской подводной лодки проекта 636 в северных водах, что свидетельствует о растущей активности НАТО в наблюдении за военно-морскими силами России. Недавние фотографии, сдела…

😁6🥴4👍3💯2❤1💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 466 posts we hold for @RussianArms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЗИМОВСКИЙ
@zimovskyAL · 18,807
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
ОДК
@uecrus_official · 23,694
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Тульские новости
@newstula · 19,276
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русское оружие” (@RussianArms), 13,270 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RussianArms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.