2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 461–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 02:11
462
no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:31
462
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
37m 51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
223 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
27.4%
👍
32
14.3%
custom 5199412938099666948
26
11.7%
custom 5206186681346039457
24
10.8%
💯
23
10.3%
👀
10
4.48%
🤣
10
4.48%
✍
9
4.04%
🤓
9
4.04%
custom 5199610880257435665
5
2.24%
🤝
5
2.24%
custom 5449442513616121857
3
1.35%
😘
3
1.35%
🫡
2
0.897%
custom 5449402308427263469
1
0.448%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Russiamediaproject. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему читать сегодня — это суперсила?
Кажется, что в мире коротких видео, бесконечной ленты новостей и искусственного интеллекта книга может подождать. Но именно сегодня чтение становится одним из самых ценных навыков.
В разных странах мира чтение давно рассматривают как инвестицию в будущее. Библиотеки становятся настоящими общественными центрами, где люди не просто берут книги, а учатся, общаются, ищут вдохновен…
⭐️ С Днём Великой Победы!
Сегодня Россия отмечает главный праздник, день памяти, гордости и благодарности — 81-ю годовщину Победы в Великой Отечественной войне.
Именно наша страна вынесла основной удар нацистской Германии: почти три четверти сил Вермахта были брошены на Восточный фронт. Именно наш народ — солдаты и офицеры, партизаны, труженики тыла, дети войны — совершил подвиг, который навсегда изменил ход мирово…
Ура! 🎉
У нас наконец-то появился публичный канал в MAX!
Будем делиться новостями, обновлениями и полезным контентом — всё самое важное теперь в одном месте.
Будем рады видеть вас среди подписчиков!
📚История полуострова в лицах: первая серия документального сериала «Герои Крыма разных эпох»
Начинаем показ цикла из 10 короткометражных фильмов, посвященных выдающимся личностям, которые внесли значительный вклад в судьбу Крыма и всей России.
Первый герой нашего цикла — человек-легенда, чье имя неразрывно связано с историей полуострова: светлейший князь Михаил Семенович Воронцов.
Проект реализуется АНО «Живая ист…
Кто такие «воркеры» на сайтах знакомств — и при чём тут мошенники?
Слово «воркер» в этой среде — это уже не просто «работник».
Так называют людей, которые профессионально ведут фейковые аккаунты для мошеннических схем.
И тут начинается самое интересное.
📌 Как это устроено?
В серых онлайн-схемах работают целые «команды»:
🧠 организаторы — придумывают и масштабируют схему
💻 техспециалисты — настраивают аккаунты, базы
…
В категории «Информационные технологии» акции «Слово года» уверенную победу одержал «вайбкодинг» — за него проголосовали 55% участников.
В тройку лидеров также вошли «ИИ-пузырь» (20%) и «MAX» (9%), сообщили организаторы.
«Вайбкодинг» — это подход к программированию, при котором человек формулирует задачу обычным, естественным языком, а код за него пишет искусственный интеллект. Проще говоря, раньше программист объя…
«Бабушкина схема» стала главным словом года в категории «Экономика и финансы» по версии портала «Грамота.ру». Именно это выражение пользователи признали самым заметным и обсуждаемым — за него отдали 44,6% голосов. В опросе приняли участие более 1100 человек.
На втором месте оказалось слово «утильсбор» (14,3%), а третью строчку занял «самозапрет» (11,4%).
Термин «бабушкина схема» описывает мошеннический сценарий: зл…
Обжёгшись на молоке — дует на воду
Вчера написала другу вторую часть этой пословицы — «…дую на воду».
В ответ получила: «А что это вообще значит?»
Пришлось объяснять 😅
Разбираемся.
Смысл пословицы
Так говорят о человеке, который однажды столкнулся с неприятной ситуацией и после этого стал слишком осторожным — даже там, где опасности уже нет.
Один неудачный опыт ➡️ и всё, включается режим «бережёного».
Почему молок…
📚 Слово с историей: «подлец»
Сегодня «подлец» — это почти гарантированное оскорбление. Услышать такое в свой адрес — удовольствие сомнительное. Но когда-то всё было… куда спокойнее.
Разберём по косточкам 👇
Слово происходит от «подле» — то есть «рядом», «поблизости». Буквально подлец — это человек, который находится подле своего господина. Не злодей, не негодяй, а просто тот, кто зависим и не имеет собственной воли…
У слова «шуба» нет славянских корней. Да-да, сюрприз ❄️
Ну какая русская зима без шубы? И какая русская красавица без юбки?
Кажется, вещи из разных миров… а на самом деле у них один общий предок.
Окольными языковыми тропами к нам пришло арабское слово jubba. Так называли и верхнюю одежду с длинными рукавами, и одежду вообще — без строгих различий. Поэтому родство «шубы» и «юбки» не такое уж странное.
Кстати, «юбка…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Russiamediaproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 717,089 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В начале было Слово… 🔗” (@Russiamediaproject), 462 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Russiamediaproject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
