Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Конгресс собрание Русэна

@Russ3n

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002483602474
TypeChannel
Username@Russ3n
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Russ3n

Growth

859 Aug 2026, 19:46 — 85 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:34 — 85 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:4610 Aug 2026, 05:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:3485no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:4685first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.5%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.4
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (14 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total731
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2740.9%
🕊2537.9%
💘1421.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC37 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Редрав картинки с 2024

🕊6🍓3💘2

Signed Русэн

23 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC124 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ура фандом ориентаций 🤍

🍓7💘4🕊3

Signed Русэн

19 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC117 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClariiieePhoto

Когда у меня болит голова я зачастую рисую в традише. Сегодня я решила, что делать самый стандартный скетч карандашом это жесть скучно и мне хочется мяса. Расчехлила косметос, которым не особо пользуюсь и нарисовала такую вот Лиличку... (Здесь тоналка, помада фиолетовая, карандаш для глаз и белый стик (который я кстати очень люблю, но у меня тупо не было других белых продуктов)). Интересный опыт, но работать тяжело т

🍓4🕊2💘1

Signed Русэн

17 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @blenderr777Photo

Окей гугл гилти парад по вашему запросу ничего не найдено

🍓3💘1🕊1

Signed Русэн

17 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC106 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrAkoniePodzemeliePhoto

Мои друзья заставили меня нарисовать... Данную штуку... Да-да, давайте, даю вам 3 попытки угадать, на что же это у нас тут отсылка пу-пу-пу, на какую такую анимацию угу-угу

🕊4🍓1💘1

Signed Русэн

16 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @KawaiiAskeniiPhoto

➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🎇𝙄𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙧🤩🍦 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Thanks for 1🤩 !

🍓2🕊1

Signed Русэн

14 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @filicidenagitosaPhoto

чад рисует только то что чад хочет это очень ужасно #PortfolioDay

💘1🕊1

Signed Русэн

14 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC92 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClariiieePhoto

Я к счастью всё-таки вернула свой стилус. Этот реквест.....ну не задался объективно, а я тупо не в состоянии переделывать его. Грязно, криво, но уже как есть. #скетч #реквест #ос #дидж

🍓1

Signed Русэн

14 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC87 viewsread 9 August 2026

Если честн то я вообще забыла кто у меня мью кроме Аскени и Корки...

Signed Русэн

14 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC91 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrAkoniePodzemeliePhoto

Папочка был глуп, сказал, что я буду кем-то особенным... Воспитывал меня в строгости, но я был хрупким созданием. Говорил, что любит меня, не смотря ни начто. Я должен был стать суперзвездой, когда вырасту. С 9-мм сияющим глоком. Я буду суперзвездой.

🕊2🍓1💘1

Signed Русэн

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Russ3n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 330,259 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Конгресс собрание Русэна” (@Russ3n), 85 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Russ3n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.