Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Руслан Чейз

Channel

Руслан Чейз

@RuslanChaseFM

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,428subscribers

-281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001922443699
TypeChannel
Username@RuslanChaseFM
DescriptionПомогаю мужчинам быть счастливыми в личной жизни 1000+ консультаций Ссылка для друга: @russe_chase По всем вопросам: 👉🏻 @RuslanChase ИП ТАМАРОВ МАРК ИЛЬИЧ. ИНН: 771005619840, ОГРН: 319774600483271
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RuslanChaseFM

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,4288,7108,5697 August 2026 — 8,709 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,666 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,655 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,626 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,623 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,605 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,603 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,592 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,605 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,639 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,611 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,578 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,530 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,506 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,492 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,476 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,467 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,457 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,452 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,446 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,443 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,438 subscribers13 November 2026 — 8,428 subscribers7 August 202613 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 98 days, net -281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,386–8,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 09:068,428-10
9 Nov 2026, 05:498,438-5
5 Nov 2026, 21:588,443-3
3 Nov 2026, 03:498,446-6
31 Oct 2026, 10:358,452-5
28 Oct 2026, 06:108,457-10
25 Oct 2026, 16:478,467-9
20 Oct 2026, 00:068,476-16
17 Oct 2026, 04:188,492-14
14 Oct 2026, 14:478,506-24
11 Oct 2026, 11:028,530-48
5 Oct 2026, 11:198,578-33
27 Sept 2026, 18:378,611-28
18 Sept 2026, 03:578,639+34
13 Sept 2026, 23:368,605+13
10 Sept 2026, 12:558,592-11
5 Sept 2026, 06:178,603-2
1 Sept 2026, 17:358,605-18
30 Aug 2026, 03:258,623+4
26 Aug 2026, 19:288,619first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 8,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held46 (18 May 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total26,808
Reactions total725
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 01:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,700
Videos
≈340
Links
≈343

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 17s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,094 reactions across 43 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54249724700231040891,90591.0%
custom 5217449524410199951693.30%
custom 5384182740411240426653.10%
custom 5373159350363764070311.48%
custom 5210777181046722111241.15%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,094 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 44 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RuslanChaseFM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (19.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC437 viewsread 14 November 2026

📌 Мужчины, последний вагон. 11.11 уже прошло, сегодня пятница 13 😈 ‼️ Последний день акции - «Записи уроков за 5 000 руб». Система, которая дает стабильный и ощутимый результат. Если ты устал от пикаперского популизма и от МДшной ущербности, то это то, что нужно! Просто и жестко, разжевано и без воды. Самые важные темы, о которых другие молчат, чтобы ты был полностью готов к дистанции от знакомства до с…

10 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC761 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔄 АКЦИЯ НА ЗАПИСИ УРОКОВ Мужчины, записи уроков моей системы можно приобрести сегодня по акции. Программа обучения, которая доказала свою эффективность на сотнях учеников, ждет и тебя. 14 часов материалов и 12 занятий, которые выведут тебя на новый уровень коммуникации с женщинами. ❓ Как стать увереннее и не гнобить себя. ❓ Как знакомиться вживую и в онлайне. ❓ Как быть максимально эффективн…

custom 54249724700231040899

7 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,170 views34 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Люди не прекращают меня удивлять своей простотой 🥹

custom 542497247002310408932custom 52107771810467221112

3 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,860 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Почему переписки с девушками постоянно затухают Начинаете нормально общаться, вроде есть интерес, но через пару дней уже не знаешь, что написать? Начинаешь закидывать вопросами, пытаешься вытянуть разговор, а в ответ получаешь сухое «ахах» и «понятно». И многие в такой ситуации начинают искать волшебные фразы, учатся писать правильно или пытаются казаться максимально интересными. Хотя дело не в конкретных словах, а…

custom 542497247002310408918

2 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,570 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Новое видео! Давно не трогал этого персонажа и вот опять… https://youtu.be/GSIfudfAAjA?si=TAQU7U_yrJNJHEMr

custom 542497247002310408911

2 Nov 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,480 views68 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

😏 Обожаю эту гениальную экономическую модель отношений. Мужчина предоставляет жильё, еду, деньги, комфорт и безопасность. Женщина предоставляет… ощущения. Часто мужчина соглашается платить за присутствие женщины в его жизни, и она считает своё присутствие достаточной оплатой. 📌 Женщина по своей природе меркантильна, это абсолютно нормально, но это вообще не значит, что кроме как «дышать» от нее ничего не н…

custom 542497247002310408965custom 52174495244101999513

1 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,090 views65 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

❗️Хватит быть врагом самому себе.. Многие мужчины постоянно себя буллят. Критикуют, обесценивают, а иногда откровенно гнобят, причём настолько автоматически, что даже не замечают этого. Но мало кто задумывается, что ты сам для себя самый близкий и авторитетный человек. Когда ты регулярно называешь себя идиотом, неудачником или ругаешь за любую мелочь, ты сам наносишь удары по собственной самооценке. Полностью…

custom 542497247002310408965

31 Oct 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,080 views55 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Мужская логика иногда заслуживает отдельной Нобелевской премии по психиатрии 😁 Сначала мужчина гордо бьёт себя в грудь: «Мы по природе добытчики. Мужчина глава семьи. Это заложено в нас эволюцией!» А потом женщина говорит, что ей нравится, когда мужчина хорошо зарабатывает. И в этот момент добытчик превращается в потерпевшего. 🥐: «МЕРКАНТИЛЬНАЯ ТВАРЬ! ТЕБЕ ТОЛЬКО ДЕНЬГИ НУЖНЫ!» Мужчина, ты либо гордый доб…

custom 542497247002310408955

31 Oct 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Мужчины, сегодня очередной стрим в клубе «Мужчина 2.0». Сегодня ламповый вечер, свободное общение, можно задавать свои вопросы в свободной форме, так что всех жду! Напоминаю, что в чате клуба очень много материалов, сотни часов на самые важные темы от личностного роста и спорта до коммуникации с женщинами 👇 НАВИГАЦИЯ ПО КАНАЛУ Вступить 😏 https://t.me/Chase_Tigers_bot

custom 54249724700231040891

29 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,230 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Один из подписчиков, Евгений, попросил поделиться событием, для тех, кому это будет интересно 👇 Как заново влюбиться в путешествия, не улетая на край света? (И почему я вожу людей «На собаках») Меня зовут Евгений. В жизни я занимаюсь социальным предпринимательством — помогаю людям с инвалидностью находить работу и реализовывать себя. Но есть у меня и вторая страсть, о которой до сих пор знал только близкий к…

custom 54249724700231040899custom 52174495244101999511custom 53841827404112404261

29 Oct 2026, 04:04 UTC≈1,220 views89 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

😐ТЫ ХОЧЕШЬ ЕЁ ТРАХНУТЬ, НО ДЕЛАЕШЬ ВСЁ, ЧТОБЫ ОНА ОБ ЭТОМ НЕ ДОГАДАЛАСЬ. Одна из самых идиотских, но очень актуальных проблем, с которыми сталкиваются мужчины при знакомстве с женщинами. Попал ты на свиданку с красивой девушкой, которая прям заставляет твое сердечко стучать быстрее. Ты хочешь её поцеловать, прикоснуться к ней, оказаться с ней в одной постели. Вполне нормальное, здоровое желание для мужчины, не …

custom 542497247002310408983custom 53841827404112404265custom 52174495244101999511

29 Oct 2026, 03:38 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Группа набрана ✅ Всем спасибо.

custom 54249724700231040896

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @RuslanChaseFM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RuslanChaseFM edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 May 2026, 04:52 UTCAnonymous Poll362 voters

Есть идея снять на ютуб видео на тему шизы Максима Диагноза. Там у типа фляга знатно свистит на фоне падения просмотров. Будете смотреть такой видос?

  1. Да.82%
  2. Нет.18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Максим Дивертито
@divertito_official · 20,329
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,432
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 47,192
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Андрес в деле
@andresvdele · 41,067
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Руслан Чейз” (@RuslanChaseFM), 8,428 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RuslanChaseFM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.