Channel
@RugFax
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
123subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002218648108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RugFax |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RugFax |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 123 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 124 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 124 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
> pharos farmers grinded for months just to pull 3 figs > monad testnet farmers waited a year just to get rekt > trove rugged users with insider trading > rave dao wiped buyers the same way > people still farming mm, opensea, base for years but no airdrop airdrop farming looks like easy money but 9/10 times, nothing ever comes out of it meanwhile, that same 6 months spent learning a real skill can pay you forever …
🚀 The TON blockchain just got upgraded and is now 10× faster. ⚡️ Block rate increased 6×. ⏱ Transactions are now instant, subsecond. 🪙 This was step 1 of 7 to Make TON Great Again (MTONGA). Next step: cut the already low transaction fees by 6×. ✂️
Insane how Sam Bankman- Fried had the best venture portfolio in history What SBF bought and what it's worth today: - Anthropic: $500M → $30.4B (+5,980%) - Robinhood: ~$546M → $5B (+816%) - Solana: 60M SOL at ~$8 → $5.3B at $89 (+1,012%) If he did nothing illegal he'd be worth $40 billion today wtf.
Orangie BUILT AN AI AGENT THAT TRADES MEMECOINS AND IT’S ALREADY UP $1,300 IN A WEEK. Set it up once, let it trade, and now it’s out there hunting memes on its own. @RugFax
❤1
96% OF TRADERS MADE LESS THAN $500 the house made $600M the funny part? PumpFun never pretended to be anything else
Airdrops used to change your life overnight Airdrops before - Uniswap ~$1,200 per user at launch up to ~$15,000 if you held - dYdX ~$10,000-$30,000 for active traders - ENS ~$2,000-$5,000 depending on your domains - Arbitrum ~$1,000-$3,000 for most users - ApeCoin ~$10,000 typical, top holders over $100,000 Hyperliquid ~$10,000+ average Airdrops now: ~$200 if you are lucky
🚨 Minutes after ZachXBT posted about Axiom, Pumpfun reportedly cut off swaps on all external platforms, forcing activity exclusively through its own terminal and app.
NEW: AXIOM SAYS “WE ARE SHOCKED AND DISAPPOINTED TO HEAR THAT SOMEONE ON OUR TEAM ABUSED INTERNAL CUSTOMER SUPPORT TOOLS TO LOOK UP USER WALLETS” - “WE HAVE REMOVED ACCESS TO THESE TOOLS AND WILL CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE AND HOLD THE OFFENDING PARTIES RESPONSIBLE”
NEW: ZACHXBT DROPS INVESTIGATIVE THREAD RELATED TO AXIOM EMPLOYEE SOURCE: https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2027016064534757659?s=46&t=KPznvsA10usHpmg43hcJkA
NEW: CRYPTO DATA PLATFORM COINGECKO WEIGHS SALE FOR AROUND $500 MILLION - PER COINDESK SOURCES SOURCE: https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/01/13/crypto-data-platform-coingecko-weighs-sale-for-around-usd500-million-sources-say
BREAKING: X HEAD OF PRODUCT NIKITA BIER ANNOUNCES “WE ARE BUILDING SMART CASHTAGS THAT ALLOW YOU TO SPECIFY THE EXACT ASSET (OR SMART CONTRACT) WHEN POSTING A TICKER. FROM TIMELINE, USERS WILL BE ABLE TO TAP THEM TO SEE ITS REAL-TIME PRICE ALONG WITH ALL MENTIONS OF THAT ASSET” SOURCE: https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2010277345651990564?s=46&t=KPznvsA10usHpmg43hcJkA
More news - On Photon you can now- 1️⃣Create up to 10 active wallets to trade w/ 2️⃣Split evenly or distribute specific amounts from 1 wallet to multiple wallets 3️⃣Buy/sell any token with multiple wallets simultaneously 4️⃣Set limit orders for multiple wallets w/ 1 -click - You can now trade @MOnad memecoins on GMGN now. - @TradeonNova now has better UX/Ui on PRofile Page. and Now you can see Smart Followers righ…
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @RugFax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 669,686 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RugFax” (@RugFax), 123 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RugFax.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.