Channel
@Rqejeki
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
865subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002113935255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rqejeki |
| Description | βΈβΈ ΰ© π π£π«πͺπ¨, πanna's πroperty . π πββ¬οΈ β‘ Ϋ« owner β @kVihara π πββ¬οΈ β‘ Ϋ« store β @rqejeki π πββ¬οΈ β‘ Ϋ« testiemonial β @seltoran π πββ¬οΈ β‘ Ϋ« payment β @fDabis .. Λ β β : Don't forget to literacy :D |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rqejeki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 865 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 865 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (30 May 2026 β 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,881 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
π±πΊππΎ πͺπππππ π²πΊππΊπ π½π t.me/Rqejeki/317 π½πΊπ π³πΎππππΎπππππΊπ π«πΊππΊ πΊπ½πΊ π½π @seltoran π©Ά
π±πΎπΊπ½π π π π π’πΊππΊπ ππππΎ, @rqejeki. π³πΎπ πΎπππΊπ π―ππΎππππ 1 π‘ππ πΊπ 55.000 π¨π£π± πππππ πͺπππππ π³πΎπ πΎπππΊπ π¨ππ½πππΎπππΊ 9.000 π¨π£π± πππππ πͺπππππ π³πΎπ πΎπππΊπ π΄π²π 18.000 π¨π£π± πππππ πͺπππππ πΆππΊπππ ππ π¨ππ½πππΎπππΊ 9.000 π¨π£π± πππππ πͺπππππ πΆππΊπππ ππ π΄π²π 20.000 π¨π£π± πππππ πͺπππππ π ππ πππΊππ π«πΊππ π³πΊπππΊ π£π π±ππππ’ππΊπ π’ππΊπ t.me/rindup & t.me/gwembok π΄ππππ π³πΎππππΎπππππΊπ .
Bebas deh mau di fitnah nipu lah atau apapun, padahal bisa cek di @seltoran ada 2k testiemonial & rnk di pinned sama testie baru t.me/kerangv/22. Avail rekber juga, masih ada aja yang kaya gini. Hati-hati deh ya kalau mau jahatin orang, hukum karma itu nyata. π©Ά
Emang saya pernah nipu kah..
https://t.me/jkangenpenipu/3 ya Allah, apalagi ini.. π’
Be aware ya @ jkangen & @ jkangenoriginal bukan saya oke? Cek spill an di @jkangenkotor.
Chat ke @rindup yaa teman-teman kalau mau order π©Ά
BANTU SPAM & REPORT @JKANGEN DIA MENCURI USERNAME PRIBADI SAYA YANG SUDAH SAYA PAKAI SELAMA 2 TAHUN & DIA TIDAK MEMILIKI ETIKAD BAIK UNTUK MENGEMBALIKKAN USERNAME SAYA | CONTACT @RiNDUP
HFW | BANTU REPORT & CHAT @JKANGEN USERNAME MILIK @RiNDUP DI CURI β οΈ
Halo semua, saya Vanna. Saya owner dari @rqejeki @kantion @kmantin @nwokprem @veyreseller yang dimana akun utama saya telah di banned oleh Telegram. Disini saya memiliki akun Telegram untuk akun kerja saya dengan Username @rindup [ r - i - n - d - u - p ] dengan id akun [ 8 9 5 9 7 0 5 9 4 7 ] β€οΈ
Teman-teman tolong chat @jkangen dong untuk kembalikan username nya ke @jkangenasli, soalnya dia mencuri username @ jkangen saya dan tidak punya itikad baik untuk mengembalikan username saya π’π’π’
Teman-teman disini apakah ada yang tau cara mengembalikkan akun telegram yang sudah di deakin? Dan akan kembali beserta isi akun nya
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Rqejeki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 674,261 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Rqejeki named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπβ β RQEJEKI ; OPENβ (@Rqejeki), 865 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rqejeki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.