Channel
@RpConfession228
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003338927769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RpConfession228 |
| Description | связь с владельцем @Lol_0838 бот для тейков: https://t.me/PrConfession_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 3 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RpConfession228 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 20 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 20 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 20.5% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5363813939614327183 | 17 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5195048521182504901 | 13 | 11.1% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5445089744650264292 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| custom 5438218544300978356 | 10 | 8.55% | |
| custom 5208623216293083995 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.42% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я иногда не знаю, где брать вдохновение для анкет, сюжета, постов и всего-всего. Сейчас вот уже битый час сижу над несчастным персонажем, и не могу написать даже две строчки, а мне еще второго делать… Сорол всё это дело ждет который день, бедолага.🙂↔️ ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
[🖤] ух, чета я забыла про свой же кф, так держать💪 учеба и подготовка к экзаменам дело коварное, отнимает все силы и часы в сутках.. всех с прошедшими праздниками, и напоминаю про нашего бота, пишите туда что-нибудь, ну пожалуйста🙁 как у вас дела то вообще
Signed Юрий Обэдович
[🖤] ОГО ЧТО ТЕЙКИ?????!!!!
🔥1
Signed Юрий Обэдович
Идея для вашего сюжета! Римская империя, 284 год нашей эры. Правившего Императора свергают и убивают те, кто хотел добраться до власти. Только вот куда же деть его сына? (для удобства–персонаж А) С него можно поиметь выгоду–продать в школу гладиаторов, ведь людям, захватившим трон, он больше не нужен. Сын ныне мертвого Императора вскоре отправится вслед за отцом, сгинет на арене, прекрасное зрелище! Но вместо того, …
❤🔥2custom 52086232162930839951custom 54382185443009783561
[🖤] товарищи, бустаните канал, тут будет очень красивое оформление🙏 https://t.me/boost/RpConfession228
❤🔥1custom 52086232162930839951custom 54450897446502642921
Signed Юрий Обэдович
Я очень люблю ролить в аушках какого-нибудь фильма/сериала/аниме/комикса в общем чего угодно. Запихать в какие-нибудь голодные игры своих персонажей и ролить в сеттингах разных вселенных это весело. :D ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
💯3❤🔥1🔥1
мы с моим соролом начали встречаться, поздравьте!!! ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
custom 54450897446502642927❤🔥4custom 52086232162930839954💯3
[🖤] ДА КТО ДИЗЫ СТАВИТ, ИРОДЫ
custom 54382185443009783564👎3custom 53638139396143271832
Signed Юрий Обэдович
К обсуждению выше, я на самом деле очень редко встречаю соролов готовых ролить фемслэш. В основном это конечно слэшеры, но и гетеро особо не обделены. А на фемслэш все забили, даже я сама ХАХАХА ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
👎4❤🔥3custom 54382185443009783562💯1
Бля как меня заебали эти малолетние яойщицы, которые хотят ролить только слэш. Почти половина ролевиков сейчас-это вот такие особи, и тот же фемслеш или вообще рп без отношений отролить очень трудно. ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
❤🔥4💯4custom 53638139396143271834👎2
ꉂ ˖ ࣪ 🍵 ˙ 𖥔 ᶻ 𝘇 . . ૮ ˊ ˋ ა 🌱 ⭑ #тейк @PrConfession_bot
❤🔥2💯2custom 51950485211825049012👎1
Video, posted without a caption
custom 51950485211825049014
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RpConfession228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
вечерний соц.опрос! вы предпочитаете ролить с ботами или с реальными людьми?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 24 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,698 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roleplay confession! ⸰ 𖥔 ͙ࣳ” (@RpConfession228), 20 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RpConfession228.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.