Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ROYAL STERLING EMPIRE ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ 

Channel

ROYAL STERLING EMPIRE ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ 

@Royalforexacademy1

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

3,957subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065652287
TypeChannel
Username@Royalforexacademy1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Royalforexacademy1

Growth

3,9573,9773,96711 August 2026 โ€” 3,977 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 3,974 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 3,957 subscribers11 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,954โ€“3,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:563,957-17
12 Aug 2026, 04:223,974-3
11 Aug 2026, 11:313,977first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 November 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
9.57%
avg views รท 3,957 subscribers
Avg views / post
379
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held19 (5 November 2024 โ€“ 24 July 2026)
Views total757
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค14046.8%
๐Ÿ”ฅ9732.4%
๐Ÿ‘4414.7%
๐Ÿ˜ญ51.67%
๐Ÿ˜41.34%
๐Ÿฅฐ41.34%
๐Ÿ‘Ž31.00%
๐Ÿ‘10.334%
๐Ÿ’”10.334%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC307 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ’”1

Signed Iyke

22 Jul 2026, 23:23 UTC450 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Wagwan gang

โค19๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed Iyke

22 Jun 2026, 22:36 UTC984 views81 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Do we still have up to 500 active people in here or have you all given up ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜ฉ

โค49๐Ÿ‘18๐Ÿ˜ญ5๐Ÿ‘Ž3๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ˜3

Signed Iyke

22 Jun 2026, 22:35 UTC922 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Itโ€™s about to be lit

๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ‘3

Signed Iyke

22 Jun 2026, 22:35 UTC899 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Should we revive this domain??

โค8๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed Iyke

21 Jun 2026, 18:20 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Wagwan team

๐Ÿ”ฅ11โค8

Signed Iyke

6 Oct 2025, 18:49 UTCโ‰ˆ2,580 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Growth is constant

โค17

Signed Iyke

6 Oct 2025, 18:49 UTCโ‰ˆ2,510 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ

โค3

Signed Iyke

15 Jan 2025, 11:14 UTCโ‰ˆ5,280 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/+roWmuxbU0flhMmQ8

โค9๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Iyke

27 Dec 2024, 11:41 UTCโ‰ˆ5,590 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Tap in

๐Ÿ”ฅ16๐Ÿ‘3โค2

Signed Iyke

27 Dec 2024, 11:41 UTCโ‰ˆ5,350 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/+roWmuxbU0flhMmQ8

๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed Iyke

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Royalforexacademy1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HABBY fOREX ACAdEMy
@habbyforex ยท 301,585
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here โ€” alongside 84 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
FirePips Forex Academy (Jeffforex)
@firepipsignals ยท 233,714
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here โ€” alongside 82 others โ€” read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œROYAL STERLING EMPIRE ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ โ€ (@Royalforexacademy1), 3,957 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Royalforexacademy1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.