Moving
Signed Boz PHππ₯

Channel
@ElitePHtrading
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
30,861subscribers
+484 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001759668104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElitePHtrading |
| Description | Weekly Mark ups of a few pairs and more . Free Educational content of price action .DISCLAIMER I am not a licensed financial advisor Instagram @i_am_bozmatuidi. https://instagram.com/i_am_bozmatuidi?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y Instagram @pip_hunters120 https |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElitePHtrading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 30,861 | -536 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 31,397 | -753 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 32,150 | -120 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 32,270 | +1,893 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 30,377 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (23 April 2026 β 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,033 |
| Reactions total | 440 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 19 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
1,999 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 437 | 21.9% | |
| π₯° | 411 | 20.6% | |
| β€ | 397 | 19.9% | |
| π€© | 355 | 17.8% | |
| π | 181 | 9.05% | |
| π | 168 | 8.40% | |
| π | 20 | 1.00% | |
| π | 20 | 1.00% | |
| π€ | 9 | 0.45% | |
| π | 1 | 0.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,999reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Moving
Signed Boz PHππ₯
We have approached a buy area on UC . Rn I have my eyes on lower tf as price moves to create a daily PDC showing it respecting the zone
Signed Boz PHππ₯
potential EURUSD short below 1.15185
Signed Boz PHππ₯
Set up invalidated as price breaks pass the zone
β€2
Signed Boz PHππ₯
What Iβm looking at on Nas
Signed Boz PHππ₯
Called it
π₯°155β€75π€©63π61π₯54π30
Signed Boz PHππ₯
usd broke that minor support as said in the video
Signed Boz PHππ₯
lil trade breakdown of what i am looking forward to
Signed Boz PHππ₯
Potential EU drop
Signed Boz PHππ₯
June 17. Same time. Same fundamentals. Five years ago, on June 17, 2021, I had my first biggest trading day ever $41,000 in profit. Today, I caught another major move, this time completely on my own. Same preparation. Same execution. Same discipline. The market moves in cycles, and over time, certain patterns repeat themselves. The key is being prepared when those moments show up again. Risked $2,000. Currently β¦
π₯140π€©132π83β€57π42π₯°31
Signed Boz PHππ₯
π¨Long but a must readπ¨ One thing Iβve realized over the years is that trading is less about finding the perfect strategy and more about rewiring your brain. Through a concept called neuroplasticity, our brains adapt to whatever behaviors we repeat the most. The problem is that many traders unknowingly train themselves to lose. Every time you move a stop loss, revenge trade, overleverage, or break your rules, youβre sβ¦
β€242π₯°225π₯210π€©160π68π24
Signed Boz PHππ₯
buys above 1.16420
π₯1
Signed Boz PHππ₯
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ElitePHtrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBoz PH analysis πΈπ½ π³π¬π¨π²πΊπΈβ (@ElitePHtrading), 30,861 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElitePHtrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.