9 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC75 viewsread 12 August 2026
"بَعضِي إِسْتَراحَ على بعضي فأثْقَلَهُ فَإن تَعِبتُ .. فأَيُّ البعضِ يحمِلُني؟" _
Channel
- انهيار♡| .
@Rowan25ii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
836subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001943999448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rowan25ii |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rowan25ii |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 836 | +42 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 794 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 794 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.97%
- avg views ÷ 836 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 75.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Rowan25ii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
13 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC422 viewsread 12 August 2026
من وجهة نظري… أن الشغف....قراءة المزيد
13 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC412 viewsread 12 August 2026
تتظاهر بالقوة طويلًا، ثم يأتي يومٌ واحد كفيلٌ بأن يكشف حقيقة هشاشتك، وأنك لم تكن بتلك القوة التي ظننتها فتدرك أخيرًا أنك هشٌّ جدًا، تعصف بك رياحُ الأيام يمنةً ويسرةً...! _
8 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC420 viewsread 12 August 2026
تصبَّرت وانا ادري، الصَّبر عِلَّة المَشعوف، وملّ الصَّبِر مِنّا، وحِن ما تملَّلنا.. _
6 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC392 viewsread 12 August 2026
هناك أوجاعٌ لا تبحث عن حل، بل تبحث عن حضنٍ من الطمأنينة، ولا يجدها القلب إلا عند اللَّـه. فالبشر مهما أحبونا، تبقى محبتهم محدودة بقدرتهم، أما اللَّـه فيعلم مالم نستطع قوله، ويعرف ما أخفيناه حتى عن أنفسنا، ويرى ارتجافة القلب حين يشتد عليه الحنين. كم مرةٍ شعرت أن قلبك ممتلئ بالكلام، لكنك آثرت الصمت؟ ليس لأنك لا تجد الكلمات، بل لأنك تعبت من أن يقال لك: سيكون كل شيء بخير. بينما قلبك كان يبحث عن شيءٍ واحد فقط! أن يشعر ب…
5 Jul 2026, 23:41 UTC274 viewsread 12 August 2026
"اللَّهُمَّ اجْبُرْ خَاطِرَ كُلِّ نَفْسٍ أَثْقَلَهَا التَّفْكِيرُ، وَامْنَحْهَا سَكِينَةً لَا يُعَكِّرُهَا هَمٌّ، وَسَلَامًا لَا يَقْطَعُهُ حُزْنٌ، اللهم ارْزُقْنا طُمَأْنِينَةً تَمْلَأُ قَلْوبنا وَرَاحَةً تَغْمُرُ ارواحنا _
24 Jun 2026, 19:40 UTC430 viewsread 12 August 2026
" لم يكن حزنا عاديا ، كانت . . خيبات متتالية هزائم مستمرة فقدان الرغبة في كل شيء" _
21 Jun 2026, 18:11 UTC483 viewsread 12 August 2026
- ومرة في العُمر، يقف الإنسان بجوارِ أحدِهم، ولا يودُّ التحرُّك، حتى لو فاته العالَم _
19 Jun 2026, 16:37 UTC478 viewsread 12 August 2026
انقهر لاشفت الكفو تضلمه دنياه وانغبن لاشفت الايام عزت رخوم _
17 Jun 2026, 19:56 UTC456 viewsread 12 August 2026
الأمان الوحيد عندما قال الله عز وجل: يا موسى إني أنا الله لا تفكر بقوة الظروف، فكر بقوة الله _
14 Jun 2026, 19:35 UTC462 viewsread 12 August 2026
اللهُم أنزِل على قلبي السَّكينة لأقدارك، والرِّضا في اختيارك، والاستسلام لأحكامك، وامنحني يا ربِّ الصبر الذي أعبُر بهِ ثِقل الأيام، وارزقني اللُّطف الذي يُحاوطني على الدوام، وكُن لي مُعينًا ونصيرًا فلا حولَ لِي ولا قوةَ إلا بِك، وما خابَ مَن بحولِكَ وقوتكَ استعان. _
9 Jun 2026, 17:01 UTC460 viewsread 12 August 2026
فكره إن محدش عمل اي مجهود عشان يراضيك فكرة محزنه جداً _
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rowan25ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 944,774 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خواطر خيال OK 🏖
@yvvovv · 142,310
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@yvvovv · 142,310
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- انهيار♡| .” (@Rowan25ii), 836 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rowan25ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.