Channel
@RovandPervie_hatecf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
883subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003437358893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RovandPervie_hatecf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RovandPervie_hatecf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 883 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 895 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 896 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 896 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 199 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
281 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 169 | 60.1% | |
| custom 5258314299985657428 | 46 | 16.4% | |
| 👀 | 34 | 12.1% | |
| 🤡 | 32 | 11.4% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
` - ` - « я считаю что нынешний мир прогнил, ведь. . .»😍😍 " т😼йлер говорил, что ***, но ➖➖ 🤩 так ли это . .🤩" 😍😍 😍😍»а можно я просто мемом по бойцовскому клубу поделюсь, бля« 😍😍 ⌨”🌟🌟бк такая хуйня позерская‘😍-‘ -’ -’-‘-‘▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ⊹ ВЫ ЗНАЛИ ЧТО СМЕШАВ сперму с апельсиновым соком, то ВЫ БУДЕТЕ ВЫГЛЯДЕТЬ КАК ЕБЛАН？ Д❤️☺️ ЧЕРТ ВОЗЬМИ ! ❤️ 😍😍😍😍😍 Д🌟б🌟🌟 по жал овать🧼 to …
Signed ︎ ︎ нилайй
(🐡💊) даттебаешечки подпищики 😁✌ как лето проходит??? #щп
custom 525831429998565742820👀4🙏1
Signed ﹫𝒹or͟͟a͟͟d𑄝 ˆ𐃷ˆ
я ненавижу блядское движение первых и ров . Единственный плюс от ров — урок , где можно отдохнуть . Собственно и всё , нам иногда даже благо видео не включают . Когда нам там говорят , что у нас ахуенная страна и такое же ахуенное будущее здесь, мне хочется смеяться и одновременно плакать , какое будущее , когда даже ров не могут сделать нормальным и без ии ? 😂 Всегда тупые и уебищные темы , нихуя мне из этого в ж…
🙏31custom 52583142999856574282
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
(🐡💊) для чайников: рекламу в бота присылаем не мы, а создатель тейк мейкера #важно
🙏19
Signed ﹫. 𝒹or͟͟a͟͟d𑄝
всеп привет, меня буллят девочки с параллели, которые состоят в блядских движениях первых , и одна из них ездит в артек. Когда они меня видят, постоянно шепчатся или снимают(снимают ток тогда, когда я иду впередм них). У нпх ещё рюкзаки все в движении первых😵💫😵💫 Окей, я хотя юы не состою в этом говне #тейк ⁝ @RovandPervie_bot @RovandPervie_hatecf
🙏33custom 52583142999856574286🤡5
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
всем привет, я сейчас нахожусь в лагере, у нас было какое-то мероприятие, посвящённое дню молодёжи. один из ведущих был типа свошником с погонами, а вторая пиарила Движение Первых, типа участвуйте в ебаной большой перемене и у вас есть шанс получить лям рублей. сво, к счастью, вроде бы не пиарили, либо ч просто не услышала 😵😵 неанон кимчи #тейк ⁝ @RovandPervie_bot @RovandPervie_hatecf
custom 525831429998565742818🤡2
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
У меня в классе была компания девочек, половина из которых состояли в движении первых. Они были такие мерзкие. Они делали вид, будто лучше всех остальных, вечно строили из себя главных (типо, во время репетиции концерта на 9 мая я и моя бро сидели на лавочке вместо того чтобы петь, и те девочки до нас доебались из-за этого (они не старосты и не были назначенными ответственными за концерт, лол)), а ещё они подлизывали…
🤡25🙏7
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
(вторая часть к предыдущему посту. Я не знаю, отправился ли вам этот тейк-продолжение и конец, но вот) И я думаю :"Классная руководитель, которая выросла в Екатеринбурге, говорит такие хорошие вещи о том, кто буквально смешал её и её родной город с дерьмом. Сильно." В общем говоря, в итоге свалила и с этой богадельни в 11 классе, спустя месяц после сданного сочинения. И глядя на нынешнюю ситуацию с образованием, я…
🙏11
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
(🐡💊) если видите сомнительные профили, рекламирующие сомнительные сервисы у нас в чате, слёзно прошу вас отмечать @dorado_user / @dorado_user советую блюрить такие слова как: BПН, бл0кировки, глушuлки, бeлыe спuски, ютyб (и любые другие заблокuрованные приложения или сайты), PKH / рoскомнадзор, пр0кси и тд, чтобы урезать случаи спама так же, у нас теперь запрещено просить работающие BПH или советовать их, поподробн…
👀13
Signed ﹫ . 𝒹or͟͟a͟͟d𑄝
Здравствуйте. Я конечно понимаю, что тут в основном люди школьного возраста и слова "бабки", закончившая школу в 2021 году не совсем валентно, но если я скажу это, многие сами будут в недоумении. Или кто-то, кто ± моего возраста скажут мне: о да это было. Так вот. С хуйнёй РоВ я впервые столкнулась тогда, когда поступила на первый курс шараги. Но такая дрянь была, что я пыталась раза 2 поступить в одно из худ.учил…
🙏17
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
Сука как меня заебала это тягомотина Я, представлюсь тот зетнутый нпс из Юнармии 4 год, каждый блядский день я натягиваю эту черную тряпошную поло, которое нас заставляют носить каждый день. Сука оно такое обдроченное, за блядские 4 тыщи которые нас заставили носить Каждую субботу у нас +2 урока блядской строевой Мне остался один год потерпеть чтобы смыться с этого говна Ров отдельная тема, господи 40 минут сидеть не…
🙏25
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
меня бесит то что РоВ решил промывать мозги детям в школе когда была шумиха с максом что впн зло в тг сидят только дадада охотно верим #тейк ⁝ @RovandPervie_bot @RovandPervie_hatecf
🙏13
Signed РоВ и Первые хкф тейки
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RovandPervie_hatecf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 812,388 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RovandPervie_hatecf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Разговоры о Важном && Движение первых hate conf” (@RovandPervie_hatecf), 883 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RovandPervie_hatecf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.