Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
A Blooming Rose, Rosie.
@RoseannesBDay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001788433501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RoseannesBDay |
| Description | Roseanne's Birthday. @RoseannesBornDay. |
| Created | 8 February 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RoseannesBDay |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
You can choose between two versions of the Twibbon: an animated GIF showcasing dynamic movement and engagement, or a static PNG file offering simplicity and versatility, catering to different preferences and platform requirements.
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ CELEBRATORY COMMEMORATION OF NATAL DAY— PHANTASMAGORIAS AT THE WITCHING HOUR: February 11th, 1997s appendix o' ROSEANNE PARK.” ✢ ᅠᅠᅠ ROSÉ's anniversary of nativity fête was suffused with an aura- analogous to the fabled Cinderella' soiree, graced with sumptuous ornamentation draped in sovereign chromatics. The locale, arrayed in effulgent aureate and azure, mirrored the illustrious ambiance of …
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤDEPICTION OF SUCH FELICITY. ㅤㅤINCLINED UPON THE EPOCHE. ㅤㅤENDEARING ROSE’s BIRTHDAY. ㅤㅤ( . . . ) COMMEMORATE: 2024’s. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ───※ ·𖥔· ※─── ㅤ 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑊ℎ𝑜𝑚 𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑 ㅤㅤ𝑊𝑒 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑂𝑛 𝐻𝑒𝑟 ㅤㅤ𝑇𝑜 𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑒’𝑠 𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝐵𝑖𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑑𝑎𝑦. ㅤㅤ𝐴𝑠 𝐹𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑂𝑓 𝑂𝑐𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛. ㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «A blooming rose, Rosie.»
Channel photo updated
Channel photo updated
Sticker, posted without a caption
If you’re having trouble using the Twibbon, you can contact us directly at @RoseBdayBot. I really appreciate all your requests for help! Once again, thank you for your participation!
ֺ ׅ ⭒࣪ ׄ ָ ּ ⭒࣪ ֺ ׅ 𝅄 ׅ ⭒࣪ ׄ Swathe girdle the phosphorescent silvery ablaze by cohere passé freely, the reflection of the solemnity that ludicrous zany admirably upon the extravagant of plea culminates betwixt the glaze of obedient scrutiny. Plenus pulchritudinis that adheres to the splendor clearly imprinted, concurrently an astonishing light with crumbs emanat…
⠀⠀⠀⭒࣪ ׄ ָ ּ ⭒࣪ ֺ ׅ 𝅄 ׅ ⭒࣪ ׄ ָ ⠀⠀⠀⿴⃟۪۪⃕᎒⃟✦ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 ⠀⠀⠀⠀𝐆𝐞𝐦 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐝𝐲𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞́'𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐲₊˚.༄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╾──────┈✬┈──────╼ ⠀⠀⠀
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @RoseannesBDay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 798,829 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RoseannesBDay named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A Blooming Rose, Rosie.” (@RoseannesBDay), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoseannesBDay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.