Channel
@RoseSmellsSweet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001872539446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RoseSmellsSweet |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RoseSmellsSweet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 162 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 162 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,088 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
بین چیزهایی که سیو کردم چه چیزهای مفیدی بوده و تازه دارم میبینم... اگر علاقه دارید به مقاله کار کردن و نمیدونید چطور عضو تیم بشید حین کارشناسی، بجز خوابیدن جلوی در دفتر استادها گروههای اینطوری هم میتونن کمک کننده باشن: https://t.me/themediversecenter
اگه برگردم عقب یکی از کارهایی که احتمالا انجام میدم نشون دادن اعتماد به نفس بیشتر و تلاش برای همکاری با اساتید دانشگاههای تاپ هست. این کار رو هیچوقت نکردم و الان تازه متوجه شدم چرا این مهم بود و چقدر میتونست کمکم کنه. پشیمون نیستم چون به مرور فیلد موردعلاقهم رو شناختم ولی خب کمک خوبی میبود. "یکسری از اساتید هستن که ترجیح میدن کسایی رو بگیرن که قبلا باهاشون ریموت کار کردن یا مثلا یکی از کانکشناشون با این فرد کار …
یکی از دوستهام سایت https://www.bonyad.net/ رو فرستاد. قهقهه زدم.
سلام! من دارم یه لیست از سایتهایی جمع میکنم که بنظرم برای دانشجوهای کامپیوتر میتونن مفید باشن. اگه سایتی هست که دوست دارید به دیگران معرفی کنید خوشحال میشم توی دایرکت واسم آدرسش رو بفرستید.
اگه شما هم واستون سواله Prompt Injection چطور انجام میشه، انواع مختلف و مثالهاش چیاند این مطلب از آقای مصباحی رو پیشنهاد میکنم بخونید. خیلی جالب و به زبان ساده بود. پ.ن: توی instant view ممکنه یه سری فیلدها خالی باشه. بهتره لینک رو باز کنید. #handy
File, posted without a caption
منتظر رادیو صبح جمعه با نشاط ام
They know that we know that they know.
امشب توی یکی از جلسههای گراف مربوط به ادیت شرکت کردم به سخنوری آقای امین و میزبانی یلدا و غزل عزیز. خیلی مفید و ظریف بودن نکاتی که آقای امین روی ویدیوهای ویجیاتو واسمون باز کردن و جو جلسه هم شیرین بود. پیشنهاد میکنم کانال مجموعهی گراف رو دنبال کنید چون بچهها هم خیلی ایدههای قشنگی دارن برای جلسات بعدی، هم خیلی خوش ذوقن. تشکر ویژه از یلدا که با قند بودنش سکوت جلسات رو پر میکنه❤️
امروز دندون عقلم رو کشیدم. خیلی خیلی ناراحتم این رو از ماهان قایم نکردم. فرصت اینکه با بالا اوردن خوناب جلوش ادای مردن رو در بیارم رو از دست دادم. مطمئنم اینبار دیگه گول میخورد. این رو گفتم شما دندونتون رو خواستید بکشید یادتون باشه از خواهر یا برادرتون پنهانش کنید.
File, posted without a caption
یکی از روشهای استفادهم از کلاد که خیلی برام درس خوندن رو لذت بخش میکنه اینه که ازش میخوام از جزوهم یه Interactive notebook با فرمت html بسازه. برای کسایی که کار نکردن میگم که باز کردن فایل html مثل باز کردن وبسایته (در ظاهر). حالا این نوت بوک میتونه به هدف درس دادن جزوه به شما باشه یا cheat sheet (خلاصه شب امتحانی) یا فقط کلی تست باشه از درستون. مثلا این فایلی که پایین میفرستم برای پایان ترم درس شبکههای کامپی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RoseSmellsSweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,128,440 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rosé.” (@RoseSmellsSweet), 162 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoseSmellsSweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.