Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Александр Романов

@Romanov_01tech

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,443subscribers

-596 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003794691025
TypeChannel
Username@Romanov_01tech
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Romanov_01tech

Growth

1,4432,0391,7416 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,971 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -596. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,354–2,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:581,443-528
7 Aug 2026, 01:541,971-68
6 Aug 2026, 19:312,039first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.9%
avg views ÷ 1,443 subscribers
Avg views / post
979
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,834
Reactions total808
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,335 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23617.7%
🔥22116.6%
19214.4%
😍18313.7%
💯15111.3%
❤‍🔥14811.1%
🎉14010.5%
custom 5208626098216145690292.17%
custom 5211104324410708947191.42%
custom 5211151195388808835130.974%
👏30.225%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Romanov_01tech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC75 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iaffclubPhoto

#эксперт #WL ⚡️❔В каких случаях WL экономически и стратегически выгоднее, чем in-house разработка? Отвечает Alexander Romanov Head of White Label 01 tech 👇🏻 🔴 Когда важна реальная стоимость времени. С собственной разработкой возникает ощущение большего контроля над продуктом, однако часто команда недооценивает сроки, бюджет и количество скрытых задач. ⚡️ Платформа — это технологическая экосистема тесно связанных

👍5🔥5👏3

3 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,150 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Запуск iGaming-проекта: пошаговый чек-лист Меня часто спрашивают, с чего начать. Поэтому собрал основные шаги - коротко и по пунктам. 1) Выбрать гео и тип продукта. Сначала страна и аудитория - все остальное, по сути, зависит от этого: лицензия, платежи, локализация, CRM, цена трафика, поведение игроков. Это поможет задать правильное направление для следующих шагов. 2) Определить источник трафика. Сразу решите: па

👍20🔥1615😍12❤‍🔥11🎉8💯5

25 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC209 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что ж, вот и закончилась Conversion Conf 🚀 Пока за окном было +35 и кипрское солнце плавило асфальт, мы воркали. В этот раз конференция еще и совпала с моим днем рождения. Не самый привычный формат празднования, но точно один из самых запоминающихся. Спасибо всем, с кем удалось пересечься. Теперь разбираем контакты, догоняем сообщения и двигаемся дальше.

🔥23😍2221💯14❤‍🔥10👍9🎉7

23 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,260 views158 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо всем за поздравления! Очень приятно получить столько теплых слов, сообщений и пожеланий. В этом году день рождения проходит на Conversion Conf, поэтому если будете завтра на конференции - обязательно подходите. Буду рад увидеться, пообщаться и познакомиться лично! 🤝

🎉6028🔥20👍11😍11custom 521110432441070894710❤‍🔥9💯9

23 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,240 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @be01teamPhoto

Любая компания — это сумма личных стандартов людей, которые в ней работают. И сегодня отличный повод отметить одного из тех, кто помогает делать 01.tech сильнее Поздравляем с днем рождения Александра Романова, Head of White Label. Спасибо за профессионализм, стратегический взгляд и высокий стандарт, который ты задаешь каждый день. Пусть впереди будет еще больше историй, которыми захочется гордиться 🤍

🎉65🔥19😍1812❤‍🔥12👍9custom 52086260982161456908💯7

21 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,480 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда вы в последний раз брали у кого-то визитку? Собираясь на Conversion Conf, разбирал вещи и наткнулся в ящике на стопку своих старых визиток. И поймал себя на мысли: когда я вообще последний раз пользовался одной из них? Сегодня все гораздо проще. QR-код, LinkedIn, Telegram - пару секунд, и контакт уже сохранен. Быстрее, удобнее, практичнее. Из любопытства решил посмотреть, насколько вообще визитки актуальны в

👍27😍21🔥1716❤‍🔥16💯7custom 52086260982161456905

17 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,210 views90 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

🪐 Hot Takes с Александром Романовым, Head of White Label 01.tech Что сейчас обсуждают в iGaming? Как AI меняет рынок? Почему White Label — все еще лучший способ войти в индустрию? Ответы на все эти вопросы смотрите в нашем видео 🤍

🔥20😍20❤‍🔥15💯14👍1110

14 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,210 views94 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

«Матрица влияния Retention» На своем выступлении на G GATE я выделил отдельный блок теме Retention. Как показало общение после выступления, именно эта часть доклада вызвала наибольший интерес. Так что делюсь и с теми, кто пропустил. Начну с того, что значение Retention меняется. Это все меньше про рассылки СМС и e-mail и все больше про комплексное управление опытом пользователя и влияние на вероятность того что он

16👍16🔥14😍13💯12❤‍🔥9custom 52111511953888088359custom 52086260982161456903

9 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,280 views220 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто не успел забрать новый выпуск G GATE Magazine на конференции - теперь его можно прочитать онлайн. У меня наконец появилось время спокойно ознакомиться с журналом целиком, и могу сказать, что выпуск получился действительно сильным. Внутри - интервью с лидерами индустрии, аналитика по разным регионам, материалы о продукте, маркетинге, AI, рекрутинге и развитии iGaming-бизнеса. Я тоже принял участие в выпуске. Рас

👍75💯34❤‍🔥30🔥29😍2220custom 52086260982161456905custom 52111511953888088354

1 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,490 views180 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3734😍30👍29💯22❤‍🔥17custom 52086260982161456906custom 52111043244107089475

30 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTC337 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

G GATE CONF прошла, и я уже в пути в Лондон. 1–2 июля буду на iGB L!VE - кто хочет встретиться, пишите 🚀

💯27👍24🔥2120❤‍🔥19😍14custom 52086260982161456902

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Romanov_01tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,709 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Романов” (@Romanov_01tech), 1,443 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Romanov_01tech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.