Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рогаткин Live

@Rogatkinlive

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

5,601subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001516999548
TypeChannel
Username@Rogatkinlive
Created10 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rogatkinlive

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

13,000 average views per post against 5,601 subscribers — an engagement rate of 232.3%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured10 of 10 published in the window (1 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled130,103
Mature posts only232.3% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,601 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8%
Position in cohort99.797th percentile · 16.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.228% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,6015,6085,604.56 August 2026 — 5,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,608 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,604 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,601 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,600–5,609 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:075,601-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:155,604-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:555,608+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:345,607no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:485,607first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
232.3%
avg views ÷ 5,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,000
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.322%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (26 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total130,103
Reactions total419
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 29s
Average length
3m 26s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

723 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22130.6%
🔥17624.3%
10614.7%
🤬7410.2%
🤯344.70%
👏304.15%
🤔273.73%
👎192.63%
😁172.35%
😭111.52%
😱70.968%
😍10.138%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC793 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️Наикрутейший фильм Андрея Кондрашова «Аэропорт». Смотреть всем! Ранним утром 26 мая 2014 года со взлетно-посадочной полосы аэропорта имени Сергея Прокофьева взлетел авиалайнер, следовавший из Донецка в Киев. Уже было понятно, что противостояние между майданным режимом и дончанами может разрешиться большой кровью, ведь одесская трагедия накануне показала, как власть расправляется с невооруженным сопротивлением. У

🔥339👍2

3 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,320 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpenUkraineVideo

«Ну чё, кто курва, блть?! Кто, курва, блть?! Спать, нах*й!» Василий «Пельмень» Камоцкий нокаутировал поляка Давида Залевского после того, как тот перед боем назвал его курвой. Русский отомстил не только за себя но и за поруганных украинцев ❗️ @OpenUkraine

👏30👍169😁8🔥4

1 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,570 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️С офигенным интересом прослушал заявление директрисы «Вайлдберриз»… Т.е. раскрашенных в цвета фуксии грузовиков с надписью «WB - в помощь СВО» мы так и не увидим? @Rogatkinlive

🤔147👍5👎3😁3🔥2😍1

30 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,890 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️Оставим эту новость здесь без комментариев. Все, что мы хотели сказать по этой теме, сказали в предыдущей публикации. @Rogatkinlive

👍10🔥10

30 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,700 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dva_majorsPhoto

⛓️В Москве задержали замначальника управления беспилотных систем и робототехники Минпромторга Аллу Половченю Задержанная подозревается в растрате госсредств в особо крупном размере (ч. 4 ст. 160 УК). По данным СМИ, Половченя участвовала в схеме с реализацией проекта «Транспорт будущего», в рамках которого создавалось предприятие для сборки дронов якобы российского производства. При этом компания публично заявляла о

🤬36😱74👍4😭2

28 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈116,000 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️В Тамбове закрылось производство квадрокоптеров «Бекас», знаменитых дронов-батонов, выпуск которых наладил Тамбовский Хлебокомбинат. Наш первый сюжет о «Бекасах» потом повторили более 30 мировых телеканалов и агентств. Рад за наше МО. Наконец-то оснащение армии фпв-дронами настолько превысило потребности фронта, что «аутсайдеры» народного производства вынуждены закрываться с забитыми складами по всем законам рыноч

🤬35🤯33🤔83👎3🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,290 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @verdiktmediaPhoto

«Бекас»: три с половиной года, которые не прошли даром Тамбовское предприятие «Бекас» подвело итоги трёх с половиной лет работы. Выпуск продукции завершён, соответствующее уведомление в начале июля направлено в Минпромторг России. Об этом рассказал руководитель предприятия Александр Рудик в своем интервью в канале «Бекас». История «Бекаса» началась в 2023 году практически с чистого листа. Специализированной отрасли

👍18😭95🤔3👎1🤯1

25 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈2,740 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В данном случае оператор дрона засадил кумулятивный боеприпас прямо в район орудия. Даже если не было подрыва бк, Леопард надолго выведен из строя. А вообще, сейчас на «Бекасы» ставят новые кумулятивные боеприпасы, которые способны преодолевать танковую защиту в виде решеток и прочих мангалов. На полигонных испытаниях кумулятивная струя формировалась на некотором расстоянии от брони танка, как раз перед самыми реше

👍17🔥123😁1

25 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,260 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bekasdronVideo

⚡️Поражение танка Leopard 1А5 оптоволоконным дроном «Бекас-4500 Оптик» в зоне СВО. Подписаться | Мы в МАХ

🔥17👍84

25 Jul 2026, 05:01 UTC≈1,540 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeoAnalitics

Почти восемь лет я изучаю тему ИИ. В моем лонгриде попытался кратко рассказать о его роли в военных конфликтах. ИИ не всемогущ, так как его создали люди. Верхний предел его современного развития - это тактические операции, в которых наличие ИИ будет давать преимущество только в том случае, если у противоположной стороны ИИ будет отсутствовать. Однако в противостоянии военных ИИ-систем победа будет там, где помимо циф

👍14👎2🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈2,410 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️Как причудливо тасуются «Искандеры»… По одному и тому же адресу в поселке Вишневое, что под Киевом, куда был такой громкий прилет, вместе с жулянским машиностроительным заводом «Визар», который выпускал зенитно-ракетную и авиационную технику, находилось и совместное украинско-немецкое оружейное предприятие «Шмайсер». Оно переделывало под травматы пистолеты Макарова, из Калашей делало карабины, ну и понемногу клеп

🔥30👍142

18 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC≈5,740 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️Ракета зенитного комплекса «Панцирь» сбивает украинский дрон «FirePoint» в Подмосковье. Это один из 180 перехваченных сегодня под Москвой украинских БПЛА. Украинский беспилотник «Fire Point 2» несет приблизительно 100 кг. взрывчатки с поражающими элементами - металлическими шариками. Чтобы было больше человеческих жертв. Осколки повредили несколько домов в Раменском районе. Двигатель от беспилотника сломал верху

🔥32👍137🤬3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Rogatkinlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,532 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Kronshtadt Orion (en.wikipedia.org)
“…combat drones.{{Cite web |title=Куда подевались «Орионы»? |url=https://t.me/Rogatkinlive/299 |access-date=2024-04-09 |website=Telegram}} In September…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рогаткин Live” (@Rogatkinlive), 5,601 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rogatkinlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.