Channel
@RocnSport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
956subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001506321370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RocnSport |
| Created | 30 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RocnSport |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 956 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 956 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,403 |
| Reactions total | 121 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
541 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 131 | 24.2% | |
| ❤ | 122 | 22.6% | |
| 💯 | 94 | 17.4% | |
| 😢 | 68 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 7.76% | |
| 🤬 | 34 | 6.28% | |
| 🙏 | 25 | 4.62% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 3.88% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 0.739% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мысль об "открытом чемпионате России" на "челленджере" в Токио, как мне кажется, слишком оптимистична. Да, в парах при условии выдачи всем нашим статуса 1-2 медали - задача минимум, но вот в одиночке у японцев заявка не менее мощная. И всё-таки как же отрадно наконец-то снова считать дни до начала сезона.
💯25🔥10❤4👍3
Если бы это случилось после Олимпиады / Кубка Первого канала / в финальном городе тура Тутберидзе, вопросов бы точно не было. Хотя и сейчас всё довольно стройно и объяснимо. Не совсем логичным выглядит только один момент: Аделия - в числе первых обладателей обновленного статуса. Можно было бы предположить, что об этом она даже не знает, вот только кто-то же подписал ту самую анкету. Возможно, окончательно для себя …
❤32🤔6🔥3
Причем еще в субботу Аделия давала совместное интервью с Гоейхенгаузом. Либо уже оба знали, что это их последний совместный выход, либо что-то за эти дни произошло…
🤔14❤5😢4🔥3
Ой, то не вечер, то прикол…
😢8❤4
В последние месяцы в рилсах стали часто попадаться хайлайты футбольной классики. Сегодня вот глянул Арсенал vs МЮ из 2003-го под комментарий Розанова и Уткина. Вживую тот матч я не видел, АПЛ тогда еще не смотрел. Оказывается, после гола Анри, забитого из оффсайда, Василий говорит: «Нет справедливости в жизни, нет её в спорте». Ни в коем случае не хочу сказать, что Тарасова украла эту фразу и четко попала в контекс…
👍1🔥1
❗️Дорогие друзья ❤️ Шестилетний спортсмен Влад продолжает свою борьбу за здоровое детство без костылей и ограничений. Лейкоз забрал многое, химиотерапия лишила возможности прыгать, бежать, ловить мяч, приседать и многих других привычных вещей – Влад никогда не сдается и сейчас не сдался. Благодаря ежедневной терапии опережающими темпами идет восстановление всех основных функций организма, это долгий путь, каждая …
🙏5
Жизнь всех российских фанатов сегодня
💯16🤣8❤6
У нас одна квота. Кого бы вы отправили на юниорский ГП?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
жизнь фк фанатов сегодня
💯32❤10🤣5
Когда в Пекине я верил, что Саша четыре года спустя будет в Милане, думалось чуть-чуть не об этом… https://t.me/avtrusovaofficial/1925
❤20😢9🤣7💯4
Ждём 12 июля, получается
🤣16💯4🤬4
Главная фигурная новость воскресенья Ожидание: допуск Реальность:
🤣42🤬4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RocnSport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У нас одна квота. Кого бы вы отправили на юниорский ГП?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рок-н-Спорт” (@RocnSport), 956 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RocnSport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.