Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rochelle Aurélia de Vernan

Channel

Rochelle Aurélia de Vernan

@Rochelle_de_Vernan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003929566190
TypeChannel
Username@Rochelle_de_Vernan
Created6 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rochelle_de_Vernan

Growth

9111010 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9 subscribers10 August 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:159-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:5610-1
12 Aug 2026, 06:3111no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:1511first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

``~"🤍nfin, j’ai enfin retrouvé ma préférée !! 🤍 on a passé une journée absolument merveilleuse ensemble !! on a tellement discuté, rigolé et pris plein de photos ၄၃ elle me manque déjà énormément alors qu’on vient à peine de se dire au revoir :( je t’aime tellement !! 🌸 . ˳ ִ ۫Mon cher🤍

8 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC143 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ``~"🤍ujourd’hui, je voulais simplement prendre un café, mais j’y ai ִׄ 𝂅ׄ . finalement passé presque toute la journée. 🍼 J’ai l’impression de me laisser encore trop facilement distraire par les beaux endroits. ֪ ☁️ 𝆬ׄ Mais est-ce vraiment une mauvaise chose?🥹 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

7 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC133 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🤩─ 0:45 ─ 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ─────────── 🤩🤩🤩🤩

7 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC134 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👻 😀😀😀 ``~"🤍ᥲkꫀ i𝑡 slꪮw, 𝑡ᥲkꫀ i𝑡 ꫀᥲsy ꪮn mꫀ🌸 ִׄ 𝂅ׄ . 🎼 ᥲnd shꫀd sꪮmꫀ ligh𝑡 📼📼📼ㅤ 𝂅ׄ ۫ᰋ shꫀd sꪮmꫀ ligh𝑡 ꪮn mꫀ, plꫀᥲs🤍❕ ──────────────

7 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

  1. FRANÇAIS⚜️not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

7 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026

─────────────── ``~"🤍ꫀ silꫀncꫀ pᥲrlꫀ❤️ ``~" plus for𝑡 quꫀ lꫀs mꪮ𝑡s.ㅤㅤ ─────────────── 🍼🍼 🍼bout 🤍e ׄ‌ ʾ ་ꔛ᷼ ☁️ 𝆬ׄ 🤍ᥲmꫀ —🤍ꪮchꫀll 🤍wꪮ🤍ᥲmꫀ — 🤍uréliᥲ ׄ‌ ׁ 𔔁 ֪ 🤩 ׄ𝂅ׄ ۫ᰋ🤍urnᥲmꫀ — 🤍ꫀ🤍ernan ִׄ 𝂅ׄ 🤩.🤍gꫀ —16🌸 🤍ᥲcul𝑡 — 🤍ly𝑡hꫀrin ִׄ 𝂅ׄ . ─────────────── 1⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ 9️⃣🔟1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ``ABOUT ME ׄ‌ ʾ ་ꔛ᷼ 𝆬ׄ

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Rochelle_de_Vernan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

  1. FRANÇAIS⚜️not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rochelle Aurélia de Vernan” (@Rochelle_de_Vernan), 9 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rochelle_de_Vernan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.