Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rihanna's

Channel

Rihanna's

@Ririhannas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003764325686
TypeChannel
Username@Ririhannas
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 13 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ririhannas

Growth

1921941937 August 2026 — 193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 194 subscribers8 August 2026 — 194 subscribers15 August 2026 — 192 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:28192-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:48194no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:55194+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:32193first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54494425136161218572131.3%
custom 53034078402311914932029.9%
custom 53595445187838239661014.9%
custom 546982254145753377468.96%
custom 530328977158022412145.97%
custom 530326476628062903434.48%
custom 530344827734828295134.48%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC610 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎧Рианна — самая прослушиваемая певица на Спотифай на данный момент Также в топ вошли Тейлор Свифт, Леди Гага, Дуа Липа, Оливия Родриго и другие 1.Рианна 110,6 миллионов 2.Тейлор Свифт 102,6 миллионов 3.Леди Гага 101,3 миллионов 4.Шакира 99,9 миллионов 5.Ариана Гранде 95,6 миллионов 6.Кэти Перри 89,9 миллионов 7.Билли Айлиш 79,5 миллионов 8.Оливия Родриго 70,6 миллионов 9.Дуа Липа 68,9 миллионов 10.SZA 66,7 Rihanna

custom 544944251361612185710

5 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC481 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рианна представила летнюю коллекцию Daisy Riot для своего бренда Savage x Fenty Рири задала главный цвет сезона — и это масляно-желтый Выглядит очень нежно, но в то же время дерзко 🌸 Rihanna’s

custom 53595445187838239666custom 53032897715802241214custom 54698225414575337743custom 53034078402311914931custom 53034482773482829511custom 54494425136161218571

24 Jun 2026, 11:30 UTC588 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В начале своей карьеры, в 2013 году, Дуа Липа записала кавер на хит Рианны Stay

custom 53034078402311914931

17 Jun 2026, 08:31 UTC631 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Королева красоты Рианна для журнала EE72 Bad gal не перестает кормить публику эстетичными образами, на любование которыми вполне легально тратить часы. Для подготовки к фотосессии она использовала продукты из своих линеек Fenty Beauty, Fenty Skin и Fenty Hair Photographer Szilveszter Makó Rihanna’s

custom 53034078402311914939custom 53032647662806290343custom 54494425136161218573

21 May 2026, 08:16 UTC976 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Let’s Start There By @linkin_name3

custom 53034078402311914939custom 54494425136161218574custom 54698225414575337743

19 May 2026, 15:10 UTC893 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Guys, рада сообщить, что у меня есть для вас интересные новости. 🩷🩷 🩷🩷 🩷🩷 Sweetie English На моем втором канале Sweetie English, посвященном изучению английского языка, скоро стартует конкурс, 2 победителя которого смогут обучаться на Speaking-курсе бесплатно, а 1 человек получит приятную скидку. Даже если у вас высокий или средний уровень знания английского, вам может не хватать разговорной практики. Лучший спосо

custom 53595445187838239662

18 May 2026, 19:03 UTC827 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Четвертый день Oh shh Четвертый день также вошел в коллекцию бессонных хаотичных дней тура. Концерт на этот раз проходил в городе любви, выпечки, моды и ночных клубов — в Париже. Журналисты и фанаты жаловались на отсутствие внимания от Рианны, неадекватное планирование мероприятий, нарушенный график сна и в общем-то на хаос, в который превратился тур. Отдельно участникам запомнился случай в клубе, когда один из о

custom 54494425136161218573custom 53034482773482829512custom 53595445187838239662

18 May 2026, 15:05 UTC499 viewsread 8 August 2026

Журналисты и фанаты на собственной шкуре прожили жизнь настоящей Rockstar с недосыпами и хаотичными перелетами…

18 May 2026, 14:59 UTC531 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Третий день Семичасовой полет через Атлантику превратился в хаос. Пока одна половина пассажиров пыталась поспать, другая устроила шумную вечеринку (и это несмотря на то, что в общей сложности людям удалось поспать около 4 часов за 3 дня). 😏 Концерт начался с почти трехчасовым опозданием. Ее "подшучивание" не меняется. Я начал повторять за ней слова, которые она произносит перед тем, как представить песню. Например

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Ririhannas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 965,224 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rihanna's” (@Ririhannas), 192 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ririhannas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.