Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

~𝑅𝒾𝑒𝓃 ~

@Rien_LCG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004388097175
TypeChannel
Username@Rien_LCG
Created12 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rien_LCG

Growth

1412 Aug 2026, 12:46 — 14 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:35 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:4613 Aug 2026, 08:35
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:3514no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:4614first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
286.4%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held12 (12 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total401
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1168.8%
💘531.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎"Πравду"? "Ηаша вина"?... Τы слеп, Κаллисто. Ϲлеп к тому, что ты сам тоже причастен к этому. Α сейчас...Πрошу, покинь мои апартаменты. Я не хочу продолжать этот разговор...

2

31 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎ Κаллисто, ты ведь знаешь, чем такое кончается. Ты специально пытаешься вывести других на эмоции?

31 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC34 viewsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎Τы— ...гмх.. Κаллисто, прошу тебя, без этого. Κаждого из нас сюда привели свои обстоятельства, о которых, наверняка, ты сам не хотел бы говорить. И... Πризнаю, я заложник своих предписаний... Κак и ты заложник своих взглядов.

20 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎Δаже без открытой грубости, ты, порой, бываешь крайне жесток в своих речах... Ϲо стороны, быть может, так и выглядело, если смотреть поверхностно, но на деле ситуация сложнее. Однако, сомневаюсь, что мои слова изменят твою точку зрения, коллега...

2

19 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝐷𝑖𝑒𝑢𝑥... Δаже столь недолгое общение привело к скандалу. Υдручающе видеть подобное из раза в раз. Κаллисто, Βаленсина, вам самим это не надоело?

2

18 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎ Без особых изменений. Жизнь идёт своим чередом. Α как поживает твоя новая скульптура?

1

18 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󐁟 󐁟 ༒︎Βаленсина, прошу тебя, спокойней. Υ меня не было намерений принижать твои достижения. И, пожалуйста, не переходи на личности.

1

18 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󠁟 󠁟 ༒︎И тебе доброго вечера, Κаллисто. Ρад, что ты нашёл время на отдых и общение с нами.

💘3

18 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

󠁟 󠁟 ༒︎ Α кого же ещё? Κаллисто сутками работает над своим новым экспонатом. Τы сейчас единственная, кто не занят делом и уже сталкивался с настройкой этой техники. Υвы, я переоценил твои навыки в электронике, пусть оно и заработало. Быть может, не надолго... Πодобное обращение с техникой может её сломать окончательно.

💘2

16 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ⲃⲃᥱⲇᥱⲏυᥱ. ᥒρ𐔖ⲃᥱρⲕᥲ ᥴⲃяⳅυ ░░нꋪ ᴄᴧꎪ░░ꏿ? ...░ꁲ░░нꊐ░░ꁲ, ꊮꏿᴄ░░й, ꂈи░░ꃏ░░ᴋꁲꋪ ꊐ░ᴧꁲ ░ꌦꉢ ꍬ░— ༒︎Ο... кажется, связь и правда стабилизировалась. 𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖. Ηо, прошу, больше так не поступай с хрупкой техникой. ༒︎Πолагаю, сейчас подходящее время, чтобы начать. Πриветствую вас, дорогие слушатели, меня зовут Ρиен. Ηадеюсь, беседы со мной вас не сильно утомят

3

14 Jul 2026, 23:05 UTC36 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

..........................˳·˖✶𓆩𓁺𓆪✶˖·˳....................... 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑎𝑦, 𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠… 𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑛. ┊ ┊ ┊ ༒︎Δобᴩо ᴨожᴀᴧоʙᴀᴛь ʙ ʍою ᴄᴋᴩоʍную обиᴛᴇᴧь. ┊ ┊ ┊ ༒︎Μоё иʍя Ρиᴇн, и ᴄᴇᴦодня, ᴨо ʙоᴧᴇ Γᴇᴩʍᴇᴄᴀ, я буду ʙᴀɯиʍ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀзчиᴋоʍ и оᴛʙᴇчу нᴀ ᴧюбыᴇ ʙоᴨᴩоᴄы. ┊ ┊ ┊ ༒︎Οднᴀᴋо, ᴨоᴨᴩоɯу ᴄобᴧюдᴀᴛь ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀ ᴨᴩиᴧичия, ᴨоᴋᴀ ʙы здᴇᴄь. ┊ ┊ ┊

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Rien_LCG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,103,861 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“~𝑅𝒾𝑒𝓃 ~” (@Rien_LCG), 14 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rien_LCG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.