Новый канал https://t.me/fdbrll

Channel
Palett
@Rgh8ll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002785311011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rgh8ll |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rgh8ll |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 43 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 41 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 41 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5249277839118720800 | 9 | 40.9% | |
| custom 5420229056601814087 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5379687309811671185 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5386414676001188085 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5192696640040881847 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5251641385391508510 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5280497088809951164 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5420103987154162783 | 1 | 4.55% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Настолько запуталась в себе, что не могу собрать свои мысли и чуть-чуть и чужие мысли — боюсь не смогу
I didn't like my own photos at all
https://t.me/Xul7h/338
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52492778391187208002custom 51926966400408818471custom 52516413853915085101custom 53864146760011880851custom 54201039871541627831custom 54202290566018140871
🐾 Palett Гордость — это умение знать себе цену, сохранять достоинство и не позволять миру ломать свои принципы. Такие люди вызывают неприязнь не из-за высокомерия, а потому что их внутренняя сила, уверенность и самоуважение напоминают другим о том, чего им самим не хватает.
Странно, как некоторые люди становятся «своими» очень быстро. Будто вы знакомы сто лет, хотя прошло пару дней. И так же странно, как другие могут быть рядом годами и оставаться абсолютно чужими.
custom 52804970888099511641custom 53796873098116711851custom 54202290566018140871
Чисто ты
Signed Диаспора
Какая она очаровательная
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52492778391187208005
File, posted without a caption
custom 53864146760011880851
As he was leaving,he told me: «You lost your meaning of life». I got scared and I called my grandfather,but he didn't pick up the phone. He was right — I lost my meaning in life 10 years ago
custom 54202290566018140872
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Rgh8ll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,251,140 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Rgh8ll named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Palett” (@Rgh8ll), 43 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rgh8ll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.