Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reptillian Calls 🐍

Channel

Reptillian Calls 🐍

@Reptillain_calls

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

662subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002202988173
TypeChannel
Username@Reptillain_calls
Created24 May 2024 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Reptillain_calls

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

662691676.57 August 2026 β€” 691 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 691 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 688 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 683 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 682 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 677 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 674 subscribers28 September 2026 β€” 662 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 52 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 658–695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 11:16662-12
14 Sept 2026, 09:20674-3
6 Sept 2026, 20:21677-5
29 Aug 2026, 15:08682-1
23 Aug 2026, 12:59683-5
15 Aug 2026, 02:26688-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:20691no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:05691first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 May 2024 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1334.2%
πŸ”₯1026.3%
πŸ‘513.2%
πŸ’―513.2%
πŸ—Ώ37.89%
πŸ†12.63%
πŸ€ͺ12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2024 to 22 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2025, 17:00 UTC239 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$LongHair - 10k Mcap https://pump.fun/coin/BZdK9eBJ1RqKverRsoiMF1GF4VHK1DtiK2XNF5yhpump This is the real name of the king charles dog which is at 15m mcap, should run a bit at least from speculatoors

❀3πŸ€ͺ1

12 Nov 2024, 00:39 UTC500 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

7 free nfts just hit $2500, very good for a free mint Much higher we are so back

πŸ—Ώ3❀1

11 Nov 2024, 18:14 UTC445 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$TDS continues to fly!! I have a feeling this will break 50m marketcap very shortly

πŸ’―3

11 Nov 2024, 04:31 UTC431 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

these are flying if you minted 7 for free those nfts are now worth $1200!!! Not bad for something that was free

πŸ”₯3❀1

11 Nov 2024, 00:45 UTC416 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The Luce TG admins are banning anyone who mentions the NFT, bullish fud imo... they do not own, or create Luce!! It's a free mint to Luce holders and the art is super good. I think these still do really good https://x.com/luvvpill3d/status/1855772007239221668

πŸ”₯3❀1

10 Nov 2024, 22:49 UTC373 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I hold some $LUCE so I was able to get a free mint on these, art is very cutesy and the dev seems to have some clout on twitter and is a big LUCE holder. Public minted out but theres still a bunch if you hold $LUCE, i think these can do really good. I personally think $LUCE is going to 100x from here, so nfts make sense for the community. https://launchmynft.io/collections/ECLg35Pofoeko1W9aG8MyPE292mG3Xb3yrocXzTZTGw…

πŸ’―2❀1

10 Nov 2024, 02:40 UTC432 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Today was good, I didnt find any good pumpfuns to ape so I didn't post anything, My main bag right now is $TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome. I think it has potential to be the next billion mcap coin, heres why. Memecoins pump based off attention, and purely attention alone. The more attention (views) your coin gets the harder it pumps, liberals doing stupid shit cause 'trump bad' is the literal definition of views, …

πŸ”₯4❀1

9 Nov 2024, 05:20 UTC505 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hey Everyone, It's been a while since I've rage quitted and deleted my socials lol. TLDR for those who forgot abt me: I ran up low 5 figs to 7 figs these past 2 years and ended up giving it all back, Started this wallet 2 months ago and finally back in 6 figure hell. Last time around we got too cocky. So I'm going back to my roots. Im here, active in the trenches searching for gems, last time I called $MICHI, $Bil…

❀5πŸ‘5πŸ†1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Reptillain_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œReptillian Calls πŸβ€ (@Reptillain_calls), 662 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reptillain_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.