Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Anna Paulina Luna

@RepLuna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

169subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010579996
TypeChannel
Username@RepLuna
Created5 February 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RepLuna

Growth

1697 Aug 2026, 14:55 — 169 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 169 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:558 Aug 2026, 15:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:17169no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:55169first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
5
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 42s
Average length
1m 56s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4756.0%
🔥2125.0%
👍1315.5%
👏11.19%
😁11.19%
🤡11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2024 to 13 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Feb 2025, 20:04 UTC≈7,050 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Thank you @MikeBenzCyber for bringing this to light. USAID is about as swampy as it gets. https://t.me/RepLuna

🔥14👍54🤡1😁1

13 Feb 2025, 06:10 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

If @POTUS' executive order to declassify these files is obstructed, we won't hesitate to hold those responsible accountable. Remember: Pam Bondi is at the DOJ now. If Congress votes to hold someone in contempt, she’ll back us. https://t.me/RepLuna

17👍2

12 Feb 2025, 06:55 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Pay attention to those with large followings arguing against declassification or attempting to undermine efforts. These are BAD actors. They exist on BOTH SIDES. A) @POTUS declassified. Meaning it will be available publicly to ALL of YOU very soon. B) We will be conducting investigations & deep diving into new info. C)The American people deserve transparency. We will be using every avenue we have to get this to you g

9👍2

12 Feb 2025, 06:52 UTC≈4,240 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

BREAKING: House Oversight announces ‘Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets’ led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna focusing on 9/11 files, Jeffrey Epstein files, JFK, RFK and MLK Jr. assassinations, the origins of COVID-19 and UFOs https://t.me/RepLuna

10👍2👏1

18 Apr 2024, 18:47 UTC≈1,840 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

No matter what The Firm™️ tries to tell you, the truth is simple: this aid package is funding both sides of the war. We cannot allow that. https://t.me/RepLuna

🔥6👍1

13 Apr 2024, 21:18 UTC≈1,660 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The fight for taking down the unconstitutional FISA is not over. There is another vote on Monday! I have sent this letter to all Republicans, and we are sending it to all Democrats. We need 218 to stand with us against the unconstitutional surveillance of Americans. https://t.me/RepLuna

3👍1

13 Apr 2024, 09:44 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

BREAKING: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has just thrown up a rare procedural hurdle on FISA renewal which will force another vote and delay sending the bill to the Senate. https://t.me/RepLuna

4🔥1

13 Apr 2024, 09:43 UTC882 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: It’s not over. There will be ONE more vote on Monday on a reconsideration of FISA in the U.S. House. The bill should be stopped because it lacks warrant protection for Americans - thanks to 86 Republicans & 126 Democrats who killed the warrant. #GetAWarrant https://t.me/RepLuna

7 Apr 2024, 19:38 UTC735 viewsread 8 August 2026

The median home price has spiked 63% in my district alone since 2019. The median household income is only $61k, while the average income to live comfortably is $94k. This is NOT sustainable for our people. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/biden-ex-chief-of-staff-admits-us-prices-too-high-experts-break-down-struggling-most

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @RepLuna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 73,078 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anna Paulina Luna” (@RepLuna), 169 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RepLuna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.