Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

٠°𝑅𝑒𝑛'𝑠𝑖 ⁽ʳᵉˢᵗ⁾٠ ࣪

@Ren1si

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

249subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680878968
TypeChannel
Username@Ren1si
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Ren1si

Growth

2496 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 249 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:18 — 249 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 07:187 Aug 2026, 02:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248–250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:18249no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:18249first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
159.1%
avg views ÷ 249 subscribers
Avg views / post
396
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,773
Reactions total266
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,120
Videos
19
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

631 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52513604687605455516710.6%
custom 52358530168919331996510.3%
custom 5253739648714291958609.51%
custom 5359630053057525780487.61%
🔥426.66%
🕊416.50%
386.02%
custom 5253579394894546547375.86%
💋375.86%
custom 5251713012561104138345.39%
🍓294.60%
custom 5253969614148220749284.44%
❤‍🔥274.28%
custom 5253732630737728911243.80%
custom 5231283437976960292233.65%
🐳121.90%
💘121.90%
🤗50.792%
🍌10.158%
🙏10.158%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ren1si. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC44 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Простите за щитпосты, но я всё-таки хотела вам рассказать. Мне становится тяжеловато рисовать на телефоне, и сейчас я ищу либо графический планшет (автономный), либо обычный планшет для рисования. Пока что выбор между XP-Pen Magic Drawing Pad и HUAWEI MatePad 11,5S PaperMatte. Как считаете, какой лучше взять? Может, у кого-то из вас есть опыт с одним из них?

❤‍🔥7custom 52358530168919331997🔥4custom 53596300530575257802💋1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

3 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC182 views40 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😀😀🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ▫️☺️• – Арт ко дню рождения, к сегодняшнему числу, я, к сожалению, доделать не успела, но зато, с горем пополам закончила эту полноценку ⭐️🗝⸝⸝ 𓂃⭐️𓍼🕰˚.𖥔 ݁ ˖ִ ׅ ⭐⭐ ㅤ ׅ 𝄂𝄚𝅦𝄚𝄞𝅄ㅤ𓂃゛

custom 535963005305752578017custom 52358530168919331999custom 52537396487142919589💋31🕊1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

29 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC133 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✨🙂🙂🙂🙂 ⭐️ 🙂🙂🙂🙂✨ (лучше поздно, чем никогда..) 🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹 🥹➖🥹ОБО МНЕ: Я Ren'si (Реньси). Рисую пальцем на телефоне в приложении ibisPaint X, в основном своих персонажей (ОС), реже – по разным фандомам🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹⭐️ 🥹➖🥹АРТ-СТАТУС: 🥹🥹 · Трейды — да · Коллабы — 50/50 · Комишки — уточнять в ЛС · Реквесты — иногда набираю на канале Буст Анонка Сона 🥹По всем вопросам в лс! – @

custom 523128343797696029210custom 52517130125611041386🍓3custom 52537396487142919582custom 535963005305752578021💋1🔥1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

25 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC155 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рисую ещё один трейдик и очень надеюсь успеть закончить арт к своему дню рождению, которое уже почти через неделю..💔

custom 523585301689193319916🔥8❤‍🔥52🕊2🍌1🍓1💋1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

17 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC259 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как будто бы у неё что-то не так с лицом, но я не могу понять что именно

custom 525373964871429195822custom 535963005305752578010💋5🐳2custom 523585301689193319921🍓1🔥1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

15 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC190 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я усвоила урок и больше не рисую картинки в чб🦈

custom 525373964871429195821🔥10❤‍🔥7custom 535963005305752578043💋1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

14 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,810 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С результатом вышло не очень, а с процессом и того сложнее. Я сбросила телефон до заводских настроек и, чтобы сохранить недоделанный арт, скинула его в избранное в телеграме ( а вы же знаете, как он сжирает качество.) В итоге дорисовывала уже почти в пикселях, но всё-таки довела до конца, хотя даже выкладывать не хотелось. Думаю, перерисую этого персонажа заново с другой идеей 🤲 Гифт для @fosstet

custom 525136046876054555124💋7🕊74custom 52358530168919331993custom 52537396487142919583🍓2custom 52312834379769602921

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

9 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC274 views48 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, это будет мой первый чб арт… Я хотела показать свой невероятный профессионализм и решила попробовать новый способ, сначала нарисовать черно белый вариант, а потом его покрасить. Но так вышло, что покрасить у меня его уже не выходит. Видимо, это судьба 🦈

custom 525136046876054555120custom 535963005305752578010🍓83custom 52539696141482207493🔥2🕊1🙏1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

8 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTCviews —

٠°𝑅𝑒𝑛'𝑠𝑖 ⁽ʳᵉˢᵗ⁾٠ ࣪ pinned «Давайте вы мне мегакрутого адопта, а я вам арт (ну пожалуйста) А то у меня, если честно, всего полтора персонажа и есть 🤲»

8 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC≈2,170 views45 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

После долгих мучений второй гифтик наконец-то готов!💃 Если честно, у меня вообще не было идей для арта с этим персонажем, поэтому я решила остановиться на чём-то не слишком сложном. И всё равно с фоном я помучилась ( мне явно пора начинать учиться их рисовать..) гифт для @fosstet

custom 525171301256110413821custom 525373263073772891110custom 52535793948945465478🔥3custom 523128343797696029221

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

29 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC226 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Випочка Китайские туториалы творят чудеса

custom 525357939489454654715❤‍🔥8🕊5🍓32custom 52358530168919331992💋1🔥1

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

22 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC231 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давайте вы мне мегакрутого адопта, а я вам арт (ну пожалуйста) А то у меня, если честно, всего полтора персонажа и есть 🤲

custom 523585301689193319912🤗5💋3custom 525396961414822074921🔥1custom 52537326307377289111custom 53596300530575257801

Signed ‧𖥔.᥀ .«.𝙇𝙞𝙡𝒂𝒄𝒄 🎐‧ °·̩͙𝓡𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Ren1si. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,580 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“٠°𝑅𝑒𝑛'𝑠𝑖 ⁽ʳᵉˢᵗ⁾٠ ࣪” (@Ren1si), 249 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ren1si.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.