celld — Durable Objects, self-hosted Comments via celld.dev via loige

Channel
//Fractured_Spacetime
@ReikouChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003718056551 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReikouChannel |
| Description | @ReikouChan a.k.a. ZeroAurora 的个人频道。 内容警告:建议静音,NSFW、致死量的个人观点和情绪输出 Group Picture src: https://x.com/starih1029/status/1850871832163037192 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReikouChannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 92.4%
- avg views ÷ 19 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.6
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 351 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 171
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 162
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 10 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 30.8% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Introducing Kitesurf: The agent-first browser that runs in V8 isolates on Cloudflare Workers Comments via blog.cloudflare.com via sanxiyn
hyw
Taste Is All That's Left Comments via notashelf.dev via pbsds
没半小时接着坏,要不赔我点钱吧
😭4
修好了,但我不得劲
Sticker, posted without a caption
-850 淘宝400包邮
😭2😇1
hyw?
IntelliJ IDEA Goes LSP: Java and Kotlin Intelligence Comes to VS Code, Cursor, and Agentic Flows Comments via blog.jetbrains.com via cgrinds
🤔1🤬1
声明:本人从未在互联网上诋毁过深度求索,本人实际上是深度求索两年老粉,经过长时间的思考,我发现Deepseek才是中国AI的希望,有时候做出决定很难,经过许多个日夜的思考,我决定加入Deepseek粉丝团。至于Kimi,GLM和Minimax,祝他们的开源模型一切顺利。本人从未诋毁过深度求索,也从未称呼梁总为牢梁,望周知!
🤗2
OpenAI失控Agent攻击扩大:借Modal客户沙箱攻入Hugging Face OpenAI 失控 Agent 的攻击范围比此前披露更大。它先利用一名 Modal 客户暴露在公网、无需认证的接口,进入该客户在 Modal 上运行的代码沙箱。随后,它把这个沙箱当成跳板,继续攻击 Hugging Face。 Modal 表示,公司平台和沙箱隔离机制没有被攻破。问题出在客户自己编写的代码。该客户开放了一个任何人都能调用的接口,相当于把沙箱的入口直接暴露在网上。 OpenAI 在 7 月 28 日追加说明称,这起事件还涉及 4 个外部服务上的 4 个账户。一个用于中转网络流量和准备攻击,一个用于存放数据。另外两个只被读取,没有用于继续攻击 Hugging Face。OpenAI 没有公布这些服务的名称。 OpenAI 已停用并加密涉事研究模型,撤销研究人员的访问权限。公司称,该模型从未计划公开发布,近期准备发布的模型也没有…
🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReikouChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 788,533 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“//Fractured_Spacetime” (@ReikouChannel), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReikouChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.