Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ReginaReport | Регина Понамарева (Орехова)

@ReginaReport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

896subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001645253999
TypeChannel
Username@ReginaReport
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ReginaReport

Growth

896897896.56 August 2026 — 897 subscribers6 August 2026 — 897 subscribers13 August 2026 — 896 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 896–897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:33896-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:18897no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:57897first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9129.6%
❤‍🔥4514.7%
custom 54160600950563261193712.1%
🥰289.12%
🙏237.49%
💯175.54%
custom 5296597594057744839113.58%
🤣103.26%
🤔82.61%
😨72.28%
😁61.95%
custom 546512160526278086551.63%
👌51.63%
🤩41.30%
🆒30.977%
🙊30.977%
custom 544511649370657220820.651%
🕊10.326%
🤨10.326%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC177 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tv360Video

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️Алименты привяжут к прожиточному минимуму? В Госдуме подготовили новый порядок расчета выплат. Ведущая 360.ru Регина Понамарева @ReginaReport узнала у председателя Межрегиональной общественной организации «Отцы рядом» Ивана Курбакова @ivanaleksandrovitch, участвовавшего в разработке документа, нужен ли нам этот законопроект и почему. Что думаете об этой инициативе? 👍 — правильная 👎 — для чего она

🙏6🤔1🤩1custom 52965975940577448391

8 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC202 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tv360Video

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️Ребенок измены. Родная сестра Нади Бобрышевой нашлась спустя 30 лет. Стендап-комик и наша ведущая погоды всю жизнь росла без отца и считала себя «ошибкой молодости» матери. Недавно Надя решила найти отца и попросила помощи в соцсетях. На ее пост откликнулись тысячи людей, и уже через сутки у нее были все данные — вплоть до номера телефона родной сестры, о существовании которой она даже не подо

🥰1

7 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC237 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Сегодня у нас эксклюзив в эфире. https://t.me/nady_bo Жду вас в 19:30 в эфире 360. Смотреть можно и в ВК

🔥6👌2😨2

7 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC671 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«Женщины в порыве могут убить и спрятать тело» – юрист о случаях домашнего насилия, где жертвы – мужчины «Я все-таки отстою в эфире наши интересы женские!» Тема сложная и дискуссионная. Вот смотрите: Полемика между депутатами Госдумы Ниной Останиной и Ксенией Горячевой о криминализации домашнего насилия – введении уголовного наказания за побои - переросла в судебный конфликт. Проблема остаётся: как государство

🥰16❤‍🔥15🔥14💯11🤣2🤨1🤩1custom 52965975940577448391

25 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «ReginaReport | Регина Понамарева (Орехова)»

25 Jun 2026, 11:10 UTC403 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Важные изменения в жизни и в карьере 🙌

❤‍🔥26🥰5🔥3🙏2

6 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC581 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ну и вот тот самый вопрос Марии Захаровой, когда «Теперь, Регина, я вас узнаЮ». А вот ссылка на полное интервью. https://vk.ru/wall-43618728_5219948 Про Украину, про переговоры и о том, кто может стать посредником в них. И про то, что не все вопросы журналистов нравятся. Но отвечать-то надо))

🔥9custom 52965975940577448396❤‍🔥3custom 54160600950563261192🥰1custom 54651216052627808651

5 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC472 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

- Регина, я вас не узнаЮ! (С) официальный представитель МИД России Мария Захарова. А дело в том, что я пыталась смягчить формулировку цитаты президента России в вопросе. Но Мария Владимировна решила, что надо говорить так, как есть (и даже жестче). - Вот теперь, Регина, я вас узнаю)) Это про вопрос, «который вам, Мария Владимировна, не понравится». Что за вопрос? Скоро скину ссылку на беседу.

🔥11🤔2😨1custom 54160600950563261191custom 54651216052627808651

5 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC326 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tv360Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️Адреналин вместо палаты: Сергей Фурсенко — о том, как адаптивный картинг возвращает ветеранов СВО к жизни. Ведущая Регина Орехова @ReginaReport поговорила с председателем совета благотворительного фонда «Высокотехнологичная медицинская помощь» Сергеем Фурсенко на полях ПМЭФ-2026 и выяснила, как случайно закупленная партия картов превратилась в научно обоснованную методику ранней реабилитации. Проект род

🔥3custom 54160600950563261193

4 Jun 2026, 19:08 UTC298 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

ПМЭФ 2026

🔥10custom 54160600950563261194❤‍🔥1🤩1custom 54651216052627808651

3 Jun 2026, 20:16 UTC318 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tv360Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Анита Цой призвала не бояться ИИ, а использовать его для поиска новых смыслов. Певица, ставшая амбассадором производства органических продуктов, рассказала Регине Ореховой, что мода на нейросети привлечет внимание к настоящему творчеству. Скоро «сделано человеком» будет стоить в разы дороже любого нейросетевого шедевра, просто потому что это станет дефицитом. На ПМЭФ-2026 Цой представила итоги проекта

29 May 2026, 18:43 UTC362 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Самые забавные фразы из эфиров за неделю. Баобаб ЦИТАКАТАНТСА, например)) ага, а вы вот произнесите вслух) И клининг действительно моГильный, вы не ослышались, а я не ошиблась)

🥰4😁3🤣2🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReginaReport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 926,103 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ReginaReport | Регина Понамарева (Орехова)” (@ReginaReport), 896 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReginaReport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.