Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 June 2026 to 15 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @ReferralCR — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,089–7,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 06:23
7,098
-31
8 Aug 2026, 14:30
7,129
-29
7 Aug 2026, 19:32
7,158
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:26
7,158
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.78%
avg views ÷ 7,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
22 (28 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
1,017
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
352
Videos
2
Links
438
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7
63.6%
👍
3
27.3%
👎
1
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الان ۲۱ دلار برداشت کردم یعنی تبدیل به ریالش کردم فقط پنجاه تومن کم کرد و دو ثانیه بعد برداشت واریز کرد. پس فعلا عالیه با همین ربات نقد کنین و از صرافی استفاده نکنین.
فقط بلو بانک یا سامان باید داشته باشید که اینجوری بزنه.
مراحل احراز روهم که نوشتم صدبار چهل تومن برای احراز میده منم ۳۰ تومن.
۵۰ تومن کارمزد توی ۲۱ دلار برای سواپ به ریال و برداشت. یعنی حتی اگر صرافی بزنی همینقدر کم میکنه بیشتر کاری ندارم ولی محاله تو…
اگر میخاید ازینجا تتر بگیرید لازم نیست حتما رفرال گیری کنید کافیه جزو پونصد نفر اول باشید توی افراد جدید که وارد میشن اینکار راحته.
دو استخر تبدیل میشه. مثلا من الان ۲۰ میلیون سیزن کوین دارم ولی نفر ۷۰۰ هستم. اگر جدید وارد بازی میشدم و خرج میکردم الان نفر دهم بودم.
برای همین برای افراد جدید بهتره. ولی دیگه فوقش تا یه هفته دیگه . بعدش دیر میشه چون وسط فصل میرسین به بازی و از همه عقب موندین.
بازی پلی تو ارن و دلاری …
برداشت دلاری دیگه.وقتی میگم این بازی محشره الکی نمیگم رامبل جدید ما این بازیه الان.
درسته سخته ولی یکم اموزش ببینی یا خودت بازی کنی میفهمی چی به چیه.
به هرحال کلن ما با هزار الماس بازه مگر اینکه وی ای پی دو باشی یا سیزن پس خریده باشی.
رفرالشم میخرم درصورتی که فقط رفرال فعال لازم دارم و هزار داگز برای هر رفرال فعال میدم.
https://t.me/pixlandsbot/pixlands?startapp=zBAxxsw
اینم بگم من اگر میخواستم برداشت کنم تا الان …
آموزش ابتدایی بازی درامد دلاری PIXLANDS
1 قسمت تسکها
2. چه جوری شامل ایردراپ بشیم؟
۳ قسمت ارتقای کاراکتر
4. ارتقای تجهیزات
5. مارکت بازی
6. غول ها
7. ساخت سلاح
https://t.me/pixlandsbot/pixlands?startapp=zBAxxsw
جووووون جوووون 😂 دلم تنگ شده بود برای یه بازی مثل رامبل که دوباره ناخدا کلن بزنه😛. اونایی که بازی کردن برداشت کردن. الان کلن و گروه آموزشی بازی رو میزنم دوباره مثل رامبل فقط زیرمجموعه ها میتونن بیان .
به نظرم معرکس بازیش وقتی ۳۰ هزار دلار داده یعنی یه چیزی تو مایه های رامبل ارکید خودمون😎.
لینک من.
https://t.me/pixlandsbot/pixlands?startapp=zBAxxsw
اسم کلن nakhoda
تگ کلن REF
اینم واریز.پشمام ریخت شد ۱۰ دقیقه🥸. خب همینو میزدم صرافی باید یه روز صبر میکردم.
البته گفته برای بلو بانک و سامان فقط واریز کارت به کارت فعاله. ایشالا که خیره.
توضیحات رو کامل دادم بازم هرچی نفهمیدی کامنت بزار یا بیا پیوی بگم بهت. @kvyet
لینک:
https://t.me/UltraWallet_bot?start=cmVmZXJhbC03MjUzODkxMjE1
توضیحات:
https://t.me/Airdrop_Nakhoda/7796
اگر با لینک من زدین ۴۰ تومن هم من میدم خودش هم پنجاه میده میشه 90 ت…
واریز شد🫡. بزنید تا جشنواره فعاله بچه ها دائمی نیست.
نقدی هم میدم بهتون. فقط به زیرمجموعه های خودم.
#ناخدا #جشنواره #داگز
هر استارت ۹ هزار داگز ۷۰ با احراز ساده بلد نیستی بگو یادت بدم.
https://t.me/UltraWallet_bot?start=cmVmZXJhbC03MjUzODkxMjE1
اگر قبلا زدی هم میتونی روی لینک بزنی
مراحل دریافت:
1.جوایز و پاداش ها ( کلیک کنید)
2. جشنواره های فعال
3. احراز هویت
4.رفتن به قسمت جشنواره و دریافت جایزه پنج هزار داگز
…
نفری 70 هزار تومن معادل 9 هزار داگز با یک احراز ساده بگیرید جشنواره تموم میشه.
اگر زیرمجموعه من باشی 9 کا میگیری اگر نباشی پنج کا. محض احتیاط یبار بزن روی لینک شاید بگیره. از دست ندید واقعا خوبه دو دقیقه طول میکشه کارت ملی یا شناسه با کارت بانکی.
https://t.me/UltraWallet_bot?start=cmVmZXJhbC03MjUzODkxMjE1
اگر قبلا زدی هم میتونی روی لینک بزنی
مراحل دریافت:
1.جوایز و پاداش ها ( کلیک کنید)
2. جشنواره های فعال
3. احر…
Signed NAKHODA
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ReferralCR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فروش رفرال” (@ReferralCR), 7,098 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReferralCR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
