как бы вы отнеслись к тому, что тематика канала бы кардинально поменялась?
custom 52539624930924530183

Channel
@RedditHit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003385095495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RedditHit |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RedditHit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 334 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 337 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253875339616080972 | 14 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5334587022172513964 | 12 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5334844617131062652 | 11 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5253951936062838778 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5253962493092453018 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5334604893531433375 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5332473833838375262 | 2 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
как бы вы отнеслись к тому, что тематика канала бы кардинально поменялась?
custom 52539624930924530183
есть живые?
бля, я хуею. что за вирт дети появились, мне перед этим писали несколько таких спрашивали "дядя, а ты плавда скачешь на дилдо?" и подобное, пиздище
custom 53348446171310626525
anonя сегодня ходила в бесплатную стоматологию, это пиздец. почему в россии такая медицина хуевая и отношения врачей к пациентам короч, у меня выскочила какая-то хуйня во рту, а ее лечат стоматологи, ну я и пошла в бесплатку. прихожу, там сидит заплывшая жиром женщина, она даже не выслушав садит меня в кресло и начинает ковыряться в моем рту своими руками без перчаток БЕЗ ПЕРЧАТОК КАМОН, я пытаюсь сказать, что у меня…
custom 52539624930924530183custom 53324738338383752621
напоминаю о ассоц, а так же администрация ждет ваших историй и мнений в анон
христос воскрес 😇 уже бьетесь своими яйцами?
представьте, у вас горит дом, вы можете спасти только одного: чужого ребенка или свою собаку. кого бы вы выбрали?
заказывайте оформу только у этой пиздатой студии
газ много рк на коллаб
Collaboration Hype X The Reddit
custom 53345870221725139643custom 52538753396160809722custom 52539519360628387781custom 53348446171310626521
anon https://t.me/RedditHit/259 почти все челы которые выкладывают анкеты в исд такие, типо в чем смысл выкладывать анкету если ты не можешь базово поддержать диалог. они привыкли что им пишут по 10299393 человек на дню вот и нихуя не делают
custom 52538753396160809721custom 52539519360628387781
anon не история, но похуй. меня ведь не одного бесят те самый пустышки? вот знакомишься с челом и начинается, задаешь ему вопросы и на самые базовые по типу увлечений получаешь "ничем" или "не знаю". о чем вообще разговаривать с такими людьми? кроме того что нахваливать их профиль на котором чернюшная ава как пятка негра. считаю пустышки вообще неинтересные, так ладно, но они еще и считают себя чуть ли не богами. у н…
custom 52538753396160809724custom 53345870221725139641
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RedditHit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 559,693 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Reddit” (@RedditHit), 334 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RedditHit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.