Channel
@RedCrimesTribunal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001254765508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RedCrimesTribunal |
| Description | Трибунал над коммунизмом должен состояться! По взвешенным подсчётам кремлёвские коммунисты репрессировали около 60 млн представителей своего же «советского народа». А в целом в ХХ веке коммунистические режимы истребили более 100 млн человек по всему миру. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RedCrimesTribunal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 33 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 33 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 25.3% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 12.1% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2024 to 1 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пропагандистський постер на користь торгівлі газом, 1980-ті. Як і все, про що стверджує москва, це виявилося брехнею. Але ця брехня вдало працювала пів сторіччя: вона призвела до тотального роззброєння Євросоюзу, накопичування росією величезних запасів зброї і початку найбільшої континентальної війни з часів Другої світової, що має на меті зміну світового порядку і встановлення диктатури тоталітаризму.
🤣3🤬3
Цей монумент — у кожну країну
👍5👎3💯1
росія і слово «фашизм»
🤡4💯3😁3
Райком закрит
👍4😁3
Цей день в історії: 85 років тому Москвою та Берліном було укладено пакт про сумісний початок світової війни і розділення Європи, Азії та Африки між СРСР і Німеччиною.
💩5
Цей день в історії. Вторгнення у Чехословаччину з усіх окупованих москвою територій
😡3
Леніна звалили… Суджа, КурНР
👍6
Американський сертифікат допомоги голодуючим російським дітям. «Покупець цього нагодував одного маленького голодного сироту». США, 1923 рік.
👍3🤬1
Повернулася практика «літовки» текстів пісень, як це було «прі союзє». Це місце (країна) — єдине у всесвіті, де всупереч законам фізики час йде назад.
🤯5
Назад к істокам. Незабаром варто очікувати анексії Білорусі і перейменування цього утворення на СССР
🤬6
Коли почалась перша світова війна?
🌚7
Побєдобєсіє: початок
🔥4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RedCrimesTribunal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трибунал над коммунизмом” (@RedCrimesTribunal), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RedCrimesTribunal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.