Γ cada uma que me aparece, quem chamou esse aΓ para a campanha?
customΒ 51727806705308814252

Channel
@RedBullRJ
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003956113261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RedBullRJ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RedBullRJ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 33 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 33 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (8 August 2026 β 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 813 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
54 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customΒ 5341283017920898304 | 26 | 48.1% | |
| customΒ 5030664888515561317 | 20 | 37.0% | |
| customΒ 5172780670530881425 | 8 | 14.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Γ cada uma que me aparece, quem chamou esse aΓ para a campanha?
customΒ 51727806705308814252
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ChΓ©ries, vocΓͺs sabem que eu nΓ£o consigo esconder o meu amor por rosa, Γ© a minha cor, a minha assinatura, o tom que estΓ‘ em quase tudo o que eu faΓ§o. Cara, e se eu jΓ‘ passava o dia inteiro colecionando coisas dessa cor, imagina agora que eu virei o rosto da nova Red Bull?! A nova latinha Γ© totalmente rosa, do jeitinho que a gente ama, mas o melhor de tudo nΓ£o Γ© sΓ³ a estΓ©tica (apesar de estar impecΓ‘vel, nΓ©?). Γ o saborβ¦
customΒ 50306648885155613174customΒ 51727806705308814252
Photo, posted without a caption
customΒ 53412830179208983045customΒ 51727806705308814254
Sticker, posted without a caption
customΒ 53412830179208983043
π€Μ πππΎππΊΜππΎπ πππΎ, ππΊ πππΊππΎππΜπππΊ π½πΎ πππΊ ππΊππΌπΊ πππΎ ππΎ ππΎππππΎπππΊ πΌπππππΊπππΎππΎπππΎ, πππΊππ½πΎπ π πΊππΌΜ§πΊππΎππππ ππΊΜπ ππΎππππΎ πΊπΌππππΊπππΊπ½ππ π½πΎ ππΊππΌπΎπππΊπ πΊΜ πΊπ ππππΊ π½πΎ πππΊ πππΊππ½πππππ½πΊπ½πΎ. π€ πΏππ πΌππ πΎπππΎ ππΎπππ πππππΜππππ, π½πΎ ππππ πΎππΌπΎπ πΎΜππΌππΊ, πΌπππΊπππππ½πΊπ½πΎ πΎ ππΎπ πΎππΊΜππΌππΊ, πππΎ πΎππΌππ ππΎπππ π πππππ πππΎ πππΊΜ ππΎπππΎππΎπππΊπ π πππππ ππΊππ ππππ ππΊπ»ππ: ππππππΎΜπ ππΊππ, ππππππΎΜπ ππΎπππ π½π πππΎ MπΊπππΎ. π΄ππΊ πΎππΌππ ππΊ πππΎ ππΊππΌπΎπ π½πΊ πΌπΎπππΎππΊ π½πΎ πππΎ πΊ πππΊ πππΎππΎππΌΜ§β¦
customΒ 50306648885155613174
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
TππΎ π²πππππ π€π½πππππ π₯ππππΊπ π΅πΎπππΎπ ππΊπ πΎΜ ππΊππ π½π πππΎ πππΊ π»πΎπ»ππ½πΊ: πΎΜ πΊ πππππΊππΎππΊ πΎπ πΌπΊπ½πΊ πππ πΎ, πππππ½π πΊ πΏπππΌππππΊπ ππ½πΊπ½πΎ πππΎ πΊ π±πΎπ½ π‘ππ π ππΊΜ πΎππππΎππΊ πΊ ππ ππΊπ»ππ ππππΎπππππΜππΎπ , πΏππππΊπ½π πΎ πππΌπππΏπππ½πππΎπ ππΎπππΎ π πΎππΎ. π΄ππΊ πΎπ½ππΌΜ§πΊΜπ πππΎ ππΊΜπ ππΜ πΌπππππΎ π πππππΜππππ π½πΎ πΎππΎπππππΊπ, ππΊπ ππΊππ»πΎΜπ πΎππΌπΊπππΊ ππΎπ π πΌπππ½πΊπ½π πΎπ πππΊπ½ππππ πΊ πΎπππΊπΌΜ§πΊΜπ ππΊππ πΏπ ππππ½πΊ π½π πΊππ πΎπ πΌπΊπ½πΊ π½πΎππΊπ ππΎ π½π ππΊπ»ππ.
customΒ 53412830179208983045
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RedBullRJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 88,418 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βποΈ. ββ ( ππππ±πππ )β (@RedBullRJ), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RedBullRJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.