Channel
@ReclaimTheLineVic
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
154subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001575562749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReclaimTheLineVic |
| Created | 30 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReclaimTheLineVic |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @SAEducationUnited | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–3) |
| @ACTEducationUnited | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 March 2022 to 19 July 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @SAEducationUnited. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 154 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:29 | 156 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 158 | -1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 159 | -2 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 161 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 162 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 164 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 165 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Australia Freedom Rally would like to send a Massive Thank You to everyone and who joined and helped organize the combined National Sack Them All Rally last Saturday 14th of May. Due to the scheduling of the Federal Election, this national rally replaced the previously scheduled World Wide Rally for Freedom 8.0 in Australia, in order to ensure that organizers and demonstrators can focus on having an impact at the up…
📣 URGENT PLEA TO ALL AUSSIES! PLEASE HELP WHERE YOU CAN 👊 Polling Booth Volunteers for the Freedom Friendly Minor Parties. We are about 30% covered for the 21st of May. If you can help at polling stations handing out flyers, we need you! Find your nearest polling booth to chat with the local candidates by putting your address in here: www.tpaust.com.au/vote Or fill out the jot form below to get connected with yo…
📮A POWERFUL STORY WHICH MUST BE SHARED! Thank you to independent journalist Susan Pavan for telling our side of the story. Please share this with everyone especially those who have doubted you. https://i3publications.substack.com/p/fighting-the-giants-down-under?s=w
📣 TWO WEEKS TO FLATTEN THE MAJORS Voting at pre-poll has begun for some electorates. One thing we can do to help our local freedom candidates is to stand out the front of the voting locations and pass out their "how to vote" flyers. 👍 This is something that can be done for only a couple hours here and there if you’re busy. Many hands make light work 🙌 🙌 🙌 Get involved and find your local electorate group here: ht…
🇦🇺 SACK THEM ALL - MELBOURNE 🇦🇺 🖥 Website: MelbourneFreedomRally.com 📆 Join Facebook Event: AustraliaFreedomRally.com/SackThemAll 📅 SATURDAY 14TH MAY 2022 12:00PM 🏢 LOCATION: PARLIAMENT HOUSE 🗳 VOTE THE MAJORS LAST. 📣 Subscribe: t.me/MelbourneFreedomRallyUpdates 👥 Join: t.me/MelbourneFreedomRally 🟦 Follow: Facebook.com/MelbFreedom 🇦🇺 Australian Freedom Telegram Channels 🦺 Request to Join Crew #WeWillAllBeT…
📣 My final plea to all Aussies. Just one more.
The freedom revolution won't be televised but it won't need to be when millions of Aussies hit the streets on the 14th May before the federal election. Organisers of Australia's biggest freedom rallies have united for one epic event. This will be the biggest political rally against government and politicians this country has ever seen. Get your boots on the ground and be a part of history when millions of Aussies c…
VIC TEACHERS & EDUCATORS! This one is for you and your supporters. Tomorrow there is an organised rally against mandates. Please make the effort to attend and be amongst your colleagues. We are with you all the way 👊 I am sure you'll find that teachers who were coerced into the first 2 jabs and are now refusing the boosters will also be in attendance.
Brilliantly Explained❗️Please watch and listen to Dr Stephen Chavura explain the importance of turning up to the rallies on the 14th May and why it's significant for the upcoming federal election. Please make the effort to show up on the 14th and to make your vote count on the 21st. We need everybody to make a stand and make a difference! PLEASE SHARE WITH EVERYONE! Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref…
❗️VICTORIA TEACHERS! Hold the line. When the media starts reporting these stories it puts pressure on the system. We are thinking of you 🙏 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cc1LxSeqjIA/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
📮IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO ALL EDUCATORS IN AUSTRALIA! NSW & SA: While the government has dropped the mandates the reality is we don't know how each school system will respond. The best thing to do is to start applying. Schools across all sectors are desperate. We've been receiving many messages from teachers in NSW & SA who applied for jobs last week once mandates were dropped and have secured interviews this week whil…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReclaimTheLineVic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Where are you at since the mandates were introduced? Pick the most appropriate answer.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2022 to 19 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#ReclaimTheLine - Victoria” (@ReclaimTheLineVic), 154 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReclaimTheLineVic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.