Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned a photo

Channel
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕
@RebeccaPuppyChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,085subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001772014032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RebeccaPuppyChannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RebeccaPuppyChannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 1,085 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 1,091 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 1,091 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
967 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 120 | 12.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 116 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 115 | 11.9% | |
| 😍 | 112 | 11.6% | |
| 🥰 | 111 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 103 | 10.7% | |
| 💯 | 103 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 100 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 9.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 967reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
今天买是 88 美元,7 月 18 日之后就是 98 美元。 如果已经计划参加 Bitcoin Asia 2026,其实没必要继续等。 本轮门票涨价如下: 🔥 GA:88 → 98 美元 🔥 GA+:187 → 197 美元 更重要的是,这次调整之后,后面还会再涨两次,越晚买价格只会越高。 Bitcoin Asia 2026 将于 8 月 27–28 日在香港会议展览中心举行,距离大会已经不到 45 天。今年预计将成为规模最大的一届 Bitcoin Asia,亚太地区的 Bitcoin 玩家、建设者和行业嘉宾都会来到现场。 既然早晚都要买,不如现在先把价格锁住。 购票入口: https://tickets.b.tc/event/bitcoin-asia-2026?promoCodeTask=apply&promoCodeInput=BTCfuyao
🤩23❤19🥰16❤🔥15😍15🎉14🔥13👍12
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned «TRON 链上约 3.44 亿 USDT 遭 OFAC 冻结,这件事再次提醒市场:稳定币并不是完全脱离监管的资产。 未来资金来源、地址风险、交易对手方关联,都会变得更重要。 洞察报告来源: 全球网络安全联盟 https://www.gcsa.org»
TRON 链上约 3.44 亿 USDT 遭 OFAC 冻结,这件事再次提醒市场:稳定币并不是完全脱离监管的资产。 未来资金来源、地址风险、交易对手方关联,都会变得更重要。 洞察报告来源: 全球网络安全联盟 https://www.gcsa.org
🤩18❤17😍17❤🔥16👍16🔥15💯13🎉12
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned a photo
https://x.com/i/status/2011507375333916975 🌍 SOLANA 生态项目聚焦|WAOC WAOC(We Are One Connection) 一个以 爱 · 和平 · 团结 · 意识觉醒 · 人类命运共同体 为核心理念的 社区驱动型 Web3 生态系统。 WAOC 不只是一个代币, 而是在链上探索 长期价值共建 × 人类共同意识 的真实实验。 ⸻ 🧩 One Mission|WAOC 核心贡献系统 基于「行动而非口号」的链上协作机制: • 记录真实贡献 • 积累长期信誉 • 构建去中心化身份与信任 👉 one-mission.vercel.app ⸻ 🧘 WAOC 冥想 App(MVP 已上线) 融合冥想、意识连接与 Web3 身份, 探索「个体意识 × 集体共振」的新体验: 👉 waoc-meditation-mvp-test.vercel.app ⸻ 🖼️ WAOC Genesis…
😍14❤12❤🔥12🤩12🥰9🎉7👍7🔥7
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned a photo
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned a photo
香港大埔火災 Web3 行業公益支援捐助名單(陸續更新) 捐款方及金額如下(單位:港幣): 雲鋒金融集團及下屬萬通保險:捐款 1000 萬 HashKey:捐款 1000 萬 Avenir Group 及其公益基金:捐款 1000 萬 Nano Labs & ME Group:捐款 100 萬 KuCoin:捐款 200 萬 MicroBit Capital:捐款 78 萬 OSL 集團管理層與股東:捐款 300 萬 新火科技及 CEO 翁曉奇:捐款 100 萬 慢霧 SlowMist:捐款 20 萬 幣安 Binance:捐款 1000 萬 Gate:捐款 1000 萬 OKX:捐款 1000 萬 AB 公鏈 ab.org:捐款 1500 萬 DN.com Limited:捐款 10 萬 火幣 HTX & 波場 TRON:捐款 1000 萬 Matrixport 集團:捐款 300 萬 St…
💯22🤩22😍21🔥20🥰18❤🔥15👍14❤12
香港大埔火災後,Web3 行業公益支援捐助名單 2025 年 11 月 26 日,香港大埔宏福苑發生大火,火勢迅速蔓延多幢大廈,造成嚴重死傷,火警由三級升至五級。截至 12 月 1 日,事故已造成上百人罹難,多人受傷,其中包括 11 名消防員;一名 37 歲消防員在救援行動中不幸殉職。 多家 Web3 企業與機構緊急馳援,相繼發起捐助,用於支持緊急救援、災民安置及社區重建。
Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕 pinned «【AB 慈善基金會再追加 300 萬,三次捐款共 1500 萬港幣,與中國和平統一促進會香港總會踐行「獅子山下精神」】 2025 年 11 月 26 日下午,香港新界大埔宏福苑突發五級大火,造成重大人員傷亡與財產損失。這場嚴重災難牽動全港乃至全球華人社會的心,各界緊急行動,透過捐款、物資與志願服務支援受災居民。 在此背景下,2025 年 11 月 28 日,AB 慈善基金會捐款 1000 萬港幣, 12 月 1 日追加 200 萬港幣,兩次透過中國和平統一促進會香港總會捐款共 1200 萬港幣。 12…»
【AB 慈善基金會再追加 300 萬,三次捐款共 1500 萬港幣,與中國和平統一促進會香港總會踐行「獅子山下精神」】 2025 年 11 月 26 日下午,香港新界大埔宏福苑突發五級大火,造成重大人員傷亡與財產損失。這場嚴重災難牽動全港乃至全球華人社會的心,各界緊急行動,透過捐款、物資與志願服務支援受災居民。 在此背景下,2025 年 11 月 28 日,AB 慈善基金會捐款 1000 萬港幣, 12 月 1 日追加 200 萬港幣,兩次透過中國和平統一促進會香港總會捐款共 1200 萬港幣。 12 月 2 日 AB 慈善基金會再度追加捐款 300 萬港幣。至此 AB 慈善基金會就本次大埔宏福苑火災相關項目,已透過中國和平統一促進會香港總會累計捐出資金共計 1500 萬港幣,希望在香港特區政府及社會各界的共同努力下,幫助受災居民盡快恢復正常生活,延續「獅子山下精神」所代表的守望相助與團結互助。 AB 慈善基金會表示,…
❤🔥12👍10🥰10🎉9💯9😍9🔥7🤩7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RebeccaPuppyChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,306,306 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RebeccaPuppyChannel named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rebecca🐶的发财频道💕” (@RebeccaPuppyChannel), 1,085 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RebeccaPuppyChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.