$BTC 1hr Chart Update🚨 BTC is turning bearish on the 1hr after losing trend, the 50 MA, and the VWAP support back from 15 Nov📉 It is now key to identify reaction areas to the downside for bounces🎯 Downside we're watching: ➡️$92.9k ➡️$91.2k ➡️$89.5k Upside we're watching: ➡️$95k ➡️$95.7k ▶️ @RealSniperClub

Channel
Realsniperclub
@Realsniperclub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002241359670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Realsniperclub |
| Created | 30 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Realsniperclub |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 18 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 19 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
$BTC Dominance🚨 Dominance is looking bullish on the 4hr timeframe, which is good for Altcoins while BTC grinds higher as it is currently.📈 Remember the danger comes in the event of BTC falling over and dominance pumping which will then hurt the Altcoins🚨 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
GM Legends!☕️☀️ A brief ATH break from Bitcoin last night sent the market upwards before what seems to be a temporary pullback, only for the market to now start pushing again, volatility is the name of the game at the moment📈 $BTC 1hr Chart Update🚨 Today the key supports to pay attention to on any downside are the 92.5k and 91.9k areas🚨 Upside watching the highs again, anything could happen in that region with cu…
$BTC 1hr Chart🚨 Key support areas we are watching today are the $91k, $90.2k areas🚨 Moves to the upside we're watching $93k🚨👆 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
GM Degens☕️🌅 Here's a $BTC 1hr Chart update🚨 We currently have the 87k Support zone in play, watching out for the trend and sweep of around $85.5k for cheeky wicks, resistance at this stage is currently around $89.5k🚨👆 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
$ETH vs $BTC Update🚨 On major support and must bounce zone, this should revive some of the ALTS again and give a nice push to the upside📈👆 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
$BTC 2hr Chart Update🚨 Trend in play for BTC currently, we're looking for another sweep of the highs around 93k🚨 Key supports to watch today: 🟢$89100 🟢$88300 🟢$87100 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
GM Snipers!☀️ Our #Bitcoin analysis is still in play from yesterday, the areas to watch still are👇 🔴Resistance at 70.5k. 🟠Trend pressure at 69.5k. 🟢Support at 67k. Patience is the name of the game at the moment.🙌 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
#ETH ETF🚨 #OP (Optimism) could surge alongside the Ethereum ETF due to an increase in ETH users looking for faster transactions on Optimism's L2 Network.📌 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
#ICP has been retracing over the past week, and has drifted into a 0.786 reaction zone📈 Scalpers looking for entries may have something here off the 200day MA🎯 If we continue to retrace you can look for entries around 11usd📌 Update given by #thelordofentry in #SniperClub👆🏻 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
GM Snipers!☀️ Minimal movement in #Bitcoin price is seeing us consolidate in the important area around 67k. We're looking to hold this support to prepare for a healthy move, the areas to watch are👇 🔴 Resistance at 70k. 🟠 Trend pressure at 69.5k 🟢 Support at 67k. ▶️ @RealSniperClub
Blackrock’s Bitcoin ETF, #IBIT has seen rapid inflows of capital over the past few weeks, and has now overtaken Grayscale’s #GBTC. #IBIT is now leading the way in terms of #Bitcoin holdings through their ETF💰👆🏻 ▶️ @RealSniperClub
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Realsniperclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Realsniperclub” (@Realsniperclub), 18 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Realsniperclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.