Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Svetlana Lokhova

@RealSLokhova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002869878287
TypeChannel
Username@RealSLokhova
DescriptionAuthor SPYGATE EXPOSED a.co/d/cbal2pg Historian and eyewitness exposing Russia Collusion Hoax
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 15 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RealSLokhova

Growth

116 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:1611no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:3611first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
33
Videos
9
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1178.6%
🔥214.3%
17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2026, 19:11 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Jake Sullivan is planning to go after President Trump’s associates and donors As a reminder, Sullivan was Hillary’s top aide and Russiagate architect, and later was Biden’s NSA. Sullivan’s wife Maggie Goodlander was AG Garland’s top aide.

16 Feb 2026, 19:11 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A lot of Russiagate plotters in one room 3 months before the 2016 election. Sullivan, Ignatius, Albright, et al

26 Dec 2025, 19:05 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

SPYGATE EXPOSED: THE 2025 EDITION – UNMASKING THE CONSPIRACY THAT SHOOK AMERICA stands as a comprehensive, firsthand chronicle of the Russia Collusion Hoax. payhip.com/b/MqXJU From its beginning in 2015 as a fabricated narrative designed to prevent Donald Trump's election, the plot evolved to delegitimize and derail his presidency, including the bogus Mueller Inquiry. The conspiracy continued through the 2020 elec

👍1

26 Dec 2025, 19:05 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

On August 3, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama and Comey on Hillary's plan to tie Donald Trump to Russian intelligence. Obama gave the green light for the Russiagate Hoax. BRENNAN'S HANDWRITTEN NOTES John Brennan to Obama: “Cite alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on 26 July of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference from t

26 Dec 2025, 19:05 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The origins of the Russiagate Hoax The Hillary Clinton Plan to tie Donald Trump to Russian intelligence in order to distract from her email server scandal that was costing her the election. The Plan was communicated to George Soros, Hillary's major donor. First: "Demonize Donald Trump", link him to Vladimir Putin in the media. Hillary used Fusion GPS for that to feed the fake stories to their "journalists" who wer

2 Dec 2025, 11:55 UTC76 viewsread 12 August 2026

There are only three routes to get the Russiagate "burn bags" information out to the public: through litigation, through indictments, and through disclosure to Congress Why can't Congress get their act together and make this information public? It has been months @ChuckGrassley @Jim_Jordan

13 Oct 2025, 01:30 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Nicole is sad because her husband Michael Schmidt conspired with Comey and his associates in attempt to overthrow Pres Trump. Schmidt is going to jail. Schmidt penned this story based on a leak from crooked Comey on May 16, 2017. Comey admitted that he leaked to get braindead Mueller (his mentor) appointed as Special Counsel. Two days later on May 18, 2017 Mueller was appointed by corrupt Rod Rosenstein and the

👍21

13 Oct 2025, 01:29 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

WRAY UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY INVESTIGATION Chris Wray & Paul Abbate are being investigated for attempting to destroy documents, including the Durham Annex containing the Hillary Plan evidence. The case is being run by Durham's former chief investigator, Jack Eckenrode.

👍2

13 Oct 2025, 01:29 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Rather amusing that every Fake News Media outlet now has to print the list of Grand Conspiracy participants expected to be indicted

👍2

17 Sept 2025, 14:22 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

After the exposure of the Cambridge Club of UK and CIA spooks in the Russiagate conspiracy against President Trump, Devin Nunes tried to meet with UK spy chiefs to get an explanation. They refused to meet or provide any answers. Maybe President Trump will get the truth today.

17 Sept 2025, 14:22 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Soros, Clinton, Obama, Biden, Brennan, Clapper, Comey. The money, the politicians, the spies, the media, the dirty ops. The Grand Conspiracy: the Hillary plan, the “Obama Dossier” all in my book Spygate Exposed payhip.com/b/MqXJU

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RealSLokhova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 762,570 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Svetlana Lokhova” (@RealSLokhova), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealSLokhova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.