Channel
@RealNaomiWolf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
907subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266121861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RealNaomiWolf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RealNaomiWolf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 907 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 911 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 911 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The fake @naomirwolf on Telegram has 33000 duped followers and this imposter is now cheering on Pres Trump and a weird medical thing. PLEASE tell everyone you know following this awful troll that it’s fake.
The fake @naomirwolf of Telegram has a new fake article…please tell everyone this is an imposter account…
Video, posted without a caption
Bad COVID data…
I apologies for the format because this is from a back & forth email string which messed up formatting. It’s very important though because liars continual assert that masks work, when it’s been repeatedly shown they have no effect on respiratory virus transmission. To be clear, I am not the author. Dr Mike Yeadon The following is a letter to the editorial board of a small paper from about 6 months ago: Dear Editor,…
It’s my warning about the creepy exploitive illiterate fake @Naomirwolf account here on Telegram…I need your help please friends to warn folks about it.
Watch and share please…
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/iceland-bans-moderna-vaccine-use-due-heart-inflammation-risk
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RealNaomiWolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@NaomiWolf” (@RealNaomiWolf), 907 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealNaomiWolf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.